Double post:
Okay so the o-ring grooves are a touch too shallow; probably similar to the o-ring dimensions on the original piston. I tried using a variety of fine files (the only ones that could fit in the groove) with the piston attached to a drill but that has no noticeable affect.
Perhaps I'll get the grooves touched up by a machinist and reduce a 2.5-3cm portion at the front down to 30mm diameter. That should be enough for structural purposes, right?
edit: back-of-the-envelope calculations for the piston suggest removing ~130g of weight will decrease its kinetic energy from ~5300J to ~3700J. I don't expect these numbers to be correct, just a rough estimate. Sound about right? Theoretical opening time was less than 2ms but that assumed the pilot pressure had been completely evacuated at time of opening, no friction, and the combustion pressure was constant.
velocity3x wrote:MrCrowley wrote:Has anyone done flow simulations to see if there is a turbulence caused by a piston design like that?
I did a sim (1-1/2 valve) in Floworks last month. A "Tee" type valve with your piston design will have only a modicum ....
if any turbulence.
Is that with a solid piston design?
jrrdw wrote:The trick is to keep the piece wet. This will make a mirror finish...
I got some 800grit stuff for now and that works pretty well. Perhaps when everything is done I'll get some 1500 grit to make it look nicer.