A Marble and a Cork

Potatoes last one shot, so build reusable! Discuss ammo designs and ideas. Tough to find cannon part or questions? Ask here!
User avatar
boyntonstu
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:59 am

Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:50 am

Image

I countersunk a dimple on the face of the cork and hot glued the marble into it.

These are rough prototypes before cleanup.

This design may offer 'cartridge' loading.

The natural cork round weighs 112 grains.

The artificial (rubber) cork round weighs 148 grains.

What do you think about its ballistic coefficient compared to a sphere?
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Donating Members

Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:15 am

Poor man's Brenneke slug:D
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
dewey-1
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:24 am
Location: NE Wisconsin USA

Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:20 pm

boyntonstu wrote: What do you think about its ballistic coefficient compared to a sphere?
It would be much better if the marble was recessed to it's half diameter point. Eliminate the flat surface of cork which defeats the purpose somewhat.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Donating Members

Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:25 pm

Even better, why not drive a short fat bolt into the cork?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Brian the brain
Moderator
Moderator
Netherlands
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
Location: Holland
Been thanked: 3 times

Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:36 pm

Replace the cork by a small section of pipe and be done ..
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!

Can't ask for a better compliment!!
User avatar
skyjive
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:52 pm

Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:58 pm

I agree that putting the marble farther in so that the center of the marble is level with the front of the cork would reduce turbulence and thus drag in front. Also, the flat back of the cork will give you additional drag, you could file it down to a tapering curve for better performance.

On the other hand, being really careful kinda defeats the purpose of easy cheap ammo. Your choice.
User avatar
Marffy
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:03 pm
Location: earth

Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:38 pm

I would put the marbles farther in if you wanna use corks. if it were me i would use pvc instead of corks because then you could sink the marble in to your desired spot and have a hollow back end for stabilization. For both ammos i would only expect exceptional accuracy to about 30 feet with a proper metal barrel.
"Hard work has a future pay-off. Laziness pays off now."
User avatar
boyntonstu
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:59 am

Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:34 pm

Brian the brain wrote:Replace the cork by a small section of pipe and be done ..
Like this? Or, should I shorten it?

Image

Note that the metal primer holder ring has been removed.

The plastic "pipe" that remains is a perfect fit for copper type L 3/4"!

I couldn't get the marble to where I wanted it, but you should get the idea.

BTW have you seen these shots with a flat front and rear projectiles?

Pretty darn good. 905 grains!

http://www.glbarnes.com/field_justice.html
User avatar
Marffy
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:03 pm
Location: earth

Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:26 pm

Thats a good idea, to bad i don't have a shotgun. :evil:
"Hard work has a future pay-off. Laziness pays off now."
Hawkeye
Specialist 4
Specialist 4
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:12 pm

Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:28 pm

Do these all weigh exactly the same...in grains?
ONEWING
Private 3
Private 3
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:11 pm

Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:41 pm

I really dont see the appeal of using marbles inconsistant, light and expensive, as Jack suggested previously in this thread a bolt and nut would be a far better option. I posted chronograph results for shotshells at low pressure here http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/brass-h ... 20581.html , if you want a blunt projectile use a bolt in place of the nail. You already have a perfectly centred hole to use in the primer socket, so make use of it!
User avatar
boyntonstu
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:59 am

Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:46 pm

Using the primer hole up front, you add dead space inside the empty hull.

You push a marble into the hull and place hot glue on the crimp.

When you turn it over, the marble falls and it centers itself in the crimp and is glued in place.

Prochrono results today:

10d nail 184 gr 879 fps 600 psi
192 701
180 658
166 664
182 714

Marble 156 854
162 614
160 766

I believe that my manual operation of the 1/2' BV pilot is causing the inconsistencies.

The potential is there as seen in the higher numbers.

I need a spring and a trigger.
Post Reply