HEAL 320psi 20mm copper cannon (now with damage videos)

Show us your pneumatic spud gun! Discuss pneumatic (compressed gas) powered potato guns and related accessories. Valve types, actuation, pipe, materials, fittings, compressors, safety, gas choices, and more.
nivekatoz
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:05 pm

Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:33 pm

You should use a aluminum barrel...You can get sch 80 pipe any lenght at ( onlinemetals.com) sch 40 3/4 in x2-3 feet long or sch 80.....
User avatar
Zen///
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:49 pm
Location: In a foxhole sniping,Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:48 pm

You should use a aluminum barrel...
Wtf why should he this gun is near perfect as is and a aluminum barrel will ruin it's "copperyness".

There is no known advantage of using a alumninum barrel over a copper one.

And aluminum is more expensive any way.

Online metals.com? plumbing supply.com? were your last two posts.

What are you? A spam Bot?
User avatar
VH_man
Staff Sergeant 4
Staff Sergeant 4
Posts: 1827
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Been thanked: 1 time

Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:59 pm

And aluminum is more expensive any way.
UMMM, explain to me why 10 feet of 2 inch copper is..... 150 bucks..........

aluminum is way cheaper.
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:11 pm

Alas, I don't have the opportunity to order from the US. I live in England (That is England as in a part of Great Britain or the UK, not "New England") so I can't order cross atlantic
Still, copper works very well for this job, and I wouldn't want to change to an aluminium barrel - as Zen said, it would destroy the "balance" of the launcher.

@Zen: Near perfect? Bloody hell, I'm cooking on gas with this launcher - it's had a very good reception.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
Zen///
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:49 pm
Location: In a foxhole sniping,Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:20 pm

aluminum is way cheaper.
WTF!!! I thought copper was cheaper!!!
I spent (a large amount of money) on my copper gun thinking that I was saving money over a aluminumm one!!!!!!!
User avatar
Solar
Corporal
Corporal
United States of America
Posts: 545
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:53 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 17 times

Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:14 pm

Aluminum is the most abundant metal in the entire universe. It had better be cheaper!
spanerman
Specialist 4
Specialist 4
Posts: 437
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:54 pm

Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:17 pm

well its not :shock:
Image
User avatar
mtronic
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 291
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:21 am
Location: everywhere at once

Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:14 pm

This vid was awesome, made my day. Again, very nice work.
Always out numbered....
never out gunned
sandman
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 672
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:59 pm

Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:16 pm

Solar wrote:Aluminum is the most abundant metal in the entire universe.
Actually lithium is if you want to get technical.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26216
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 576 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Donating Members

Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:13 pm

sandman wrote:Actually lithium is if you want to get technical.
Or is it iron ?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Zen///
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:49 pm
Location: In a foxhole sniping,Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:28 pm

@Zen: Near perfect? Bloody hell, I'm cooking on gas with this launcher - it's had a very good reception.
Well saying it's nice/cool won't get us anything, since it's your launcher.
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:41 pm

Well, compliments get you more videos... in fact, given the decent response, there will indeed be another one, but longer, more reliably edited, and with a bigger budget (The budget for the last one summed to a couple of quid for batteries for the camera, and a few rounds of ammo from my stash).
It's going to be a pretty comprehensive video, showing damage, penetration, accuracy, and a few other things.

I'll also do a couple of upgrades to HEAL to give it a little more power, as well as taking of those efficiency suggestions JSR sometimes has to their practical extremes. Dead space could be pinched slightly, and the piston and pilot volume might be adjusted a bit, which would also shorten the launcher slightly (gotta love soldered copper. Couldn't do half of the changes with cemented PVC) - time to really earn that "High Efficency".

Expect the video in the fortnight leading up to Christmas.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10078
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Been thanked: 3 times

Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:49 am

Personally I think you should get rid of the ball valve on the barrel, with your other safety, you don't really need it.
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:55 am

I've had the suggestion before, but I take safety seriously, and it doesn't have any real negative impact on performance - so I'm not one to risk an accident.
The other safety is useful, but the barrel safety is the only one I can be sure will absolutely 100% stop the launcher firing when I don't want it to. There are other problems that might arise that the trigger safety will have no control over.

There are however other improvements I can make in that area...
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:11 am

More talking about planned changes to HEAL I'm afraid, however they're good ones.

I can work on valve flow, piston design, pilot volume and dead volume a little, but this will do only so much.

The pilot volume and dead volume are already pretty good - there is some work that can be done, not much though without major changes that would affect other things. These changes only equate to relatively small amount more power, maybe a couple of percent.
The valve flow can be improved. It's better than any other valve I've made in this size, but I believe I can still get more and cleaner flow through the valve. This is the main improvement I can make in the valve area, and hopefully it would add a significant few percent to power.
Piston design needs to remain largely unchanged, but I may be able to decrease back flow a little more, and trim a tiny amount off the weight.

Still, all these changes are small game, only adding so much, as I spent quite enough time before working on things like this to get them good in the first place.
The big change I'm hoping to make is a transition up to 25 bar (360psi) pressure, rather than the 21 bar (305 psi) I normally work at (22 bar [320 psi] is possible, but very hard to achieve). I have a plan to get the pressure from a 120 psi compressor - I'll say more later.

With the extra pressure and the changes, HEAL should be able to give a lot more than it already does. I'm still a long way short of 4 figure muzzle energies, but to get 1000J (let alone 1000 ft-lbs.) with a hand-held cannon in a low bore size would be nigh on impossible.

I'll also make some longer (but less portable) barrels for really blasting something.

Any thoughts?
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
Post Reply