Fus Ro Dah Fail

Show us your pneumatic spud gun! Discuss pneumatic (compressed gas) powered potato guns and related accessories. Valve types, actuation, pipe, materials, fittings, compressors, safety, gas choices, and more.
PVC Arsenal 17
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: United States

Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:16 pm

Without knowing anything at all about them, I decided to try making a toroidal vortex launcher.

I had no clue where to start or how to do it so I just dove right in and made a simple burst disc cannon with a cone for a barrel like this or this.

Needless to say it didn't work. Beyond a few feet it didn't even rustle a paper bag and when I dusted the cone with baby powder, it produced no noticeable rings.

Can anyone with more knowledge on the subject help me out? My best guess is that the cone (funnel) I used is not gradual enough.


Image
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Donating Members

Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:47 pm

maybe it needs to be a combustion to work like that, simply using a conical barrel?

how about a barrel made of two coaxial tubes, with the air travelling between them...
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Alster370
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:34 am

Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:56 pm

Id keep the design similar to the one they did on the big bang theory:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyAyd4WnvhU

The one in the video is a combustion, and I believe it works best when it is, due to how fast the pressure is built up.
Last edited by Alster370 on Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gippeto
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Venezuela
Posts: 2503
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:14 am
Location: Soon to be socialist shit hole.
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Donating Members

Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:57 pm

Couple wags off the top of my head. :roll:

Would think an oriface plate (similar to a flat washer) would be required to initiate the vortex ring.

Would also think a constant taper might be important. Pulling an angle from somewhere dark, I'd try 11-12 degrees.
"It could be that the purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others" – unknown

Liberalism is a mental disorder, reality is it's cure.
MRR
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:29 pm

Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:41 pm

I agree with Gippeto. In all vortex cannon that I have seen so far there was a controlled "bottleneck". You can see it at the example of an airzooka.

Image

You could try to put a expansion chamber in front of the funnel.

Edit:
This video has been posted before but I thought this remix is hilarious... :D

[youtube][/youtube]

and another...
[youtube][/youtube]
PVC Arsenal 17
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: United States

Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:28 pm

I tried a washer restriction and it didn't change much.

I think I'll start building a combustion version like that guy's prototype in the video above. Any ideas for closing off a combustion chamber so propellant gasses don't escape before firing? (Because there is no projectile)

...Other than burst disks which are inconvenient for rapid firing.
User avatar
Lockednloaded
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
United States of America
Posts: 1566
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:38 pm
Location: Texas, USA
Been thanked: 6 times

Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:30 pm

Piston combustion? You could build a tee valve with a light spring holding the chamber sealed. Kinda overkill though if you ask me...
I love lamp
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 321 times

Donating Members

Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:54 am

Lockednloaded wrote:Piston combustion? You could build a tee valve with a light spring holding the chamber sealed. Kinda overkill though if you ask me...
Why not just jam a wad of toilet paper in the breech? It doesn't have to hold pressure anyway. Besides, as discussed in another thread, and as jimmy will tell you vehemently with the power of science behind him, in practice it would take ages for the gas to diffuse anyway, so it might not even be necessary.

Also, I've never played Skyrim but I have enough internets in me to know that your launcher probably used to work, but took an arrow to the knee.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
pneumaticcannons
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 392
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:45 am
Location: shite country in asia
Contact:

Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:40 am

Why not just jam a wad of toilet paper in the breech?
That would probably disrupt the toroid...
I think the piston idea would work nicely however and you could always attach a real barrel if you get bored of shooting air :wink:

But I don't think making it combustion will make much of a difference. As stated above, the cone probably needs to be a lot more gradual like the smoke ring shooters seen on Bang Goes the Theory and myth busters.
ramicaza <- My Youtube Channel
warhead052
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1769
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:41 pm

Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:26 am

Meh, just make it a hybrid if you go with a piston combustion. Same concept, but you just add air. Dunno if it would work though.
User avatar
Insomniac
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:47 pm
Location: Australia

Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:00 am

I've built a few little vortex cannons before, and I think your problems are that the shape is incorrect on this scale, and you are using way too much air.

One of the most effective ones I made was a long postal tube (maybe 50cm long and 10cm in diameter), with a hole drilled in the cap at the end (about 5cm diameter).

A latex skin was stretched over the other end of the tube. Pulling it back and releasing would send a vortex ring quite rapidly across the room... It could be felt from a good 3 or 4 metres away in still air.

I don't think this would have worked if I had added a large chamber and valve where the latex diaphragm was. The setup I had provided a very rapid pulse of very little air, which formed the ring. I think if you are going to use a pneumatic setup, design it so that your valve dumps behind a captive piston with very little travel... Meaning each shot will move the piston a very short distance very rapidly, generating a sharp, controlled pressure wave in the tube.
I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges.
Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've forgotten this before.

Add me on msn!!! insomniac-55@hotmail.com
Post Reply