Introduction and My First Pneumatic

Show us your pneumatic spud gun! Discuss pneumatic (compressed gas) powered potato guns and related accessories. Valve types, actuation, pipe, materials, fittings, compressors, safety, gas choices, and more.
SloppyJoeES
Private
Private
United States of America
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:34 pm
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Sun Nov 03, 2019 5:30 am

Post deleted by user.
Last edited by SloppyJoeES on Sat Sep 30, 2023 3:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
SloppyJoeES
Private
Private
United States of America
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:34 pm
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Sun Nov 03, 2019 3:19 pm

Post deleted by user.
Last edited by SloppyJoeES on Sat Sep 30, 2023 3:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
farcticox1
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 12:37 pm
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Sun Nov 03, 2019 6:53 pm

Sounds good, would like to see it. I also favor airsoft as the ammo is cheap and I can get good results with only 150psi from my compressor.

This gets 826fps with 0.12g :D
007 (1).jpg
008 (1).jpg
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Donating Members

Mon Nov 04, 2019 6:09 am

Image

Image

Great work for a first effort, kudos for jumping in the deep end with high pressure, that's where the power's at :D

I would have gone for a 3/8" barrel for some proper damage, in my book 0.177" is good for semi/full auto repeaters and not much else, but you're still going to be getting some good velocities out of that.

What are you using to stop the ammunition from rolling out before firing?
def. pushing it for the valve
To be honest I wouldn't be trusting it at 850 psi regularly, assuming the working pressure is 150 psi and the safety factor is 4x, that's still 600 psi.

Have you tried looking inside the bottle regulator to see if there's any shims you could remove in order to reduce the output pressure?
Last edited by jackssmirkingrevenge on Tue Nov 05, 2019 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
SloppyJoeES
Private
Private
United States of America
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:34 pm
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:51 pm

Post deleted by user.
Last edited by SloppyJoeES on Sat Sep 30, 2023 3:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
SloppyJoeES
Private
Private
United States of America
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:34 pm
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Mon Nov 04, 2019 1:28 pm

Post deleted by user.
Attachments
Shims from regulator
Shims from regulator
7455dc06dacb59af1572892076.jpg (19.38 KiB) Viewed 8467 times
Last edited by SloppyJoeES on Sat Sep 30, 2023 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Donating Members

Tue Nov 05, 2019 7:39 am

SloppyJoeES wrote:Can I simply remove the shims in order to reduce output pressure, or do they need to be replaced with anything?
Those are not shims but belleville washers, essentially that stack is the spring that opens the regulator against pressure.

Are there any flat washers in that stack? That would be a shim. If you remove any of the bellevilles I'm not sure the regulator would still work. You could try flipping the second one from left round.

Current configuration: )) (( )) (( )) (( )) (( )) ((

Modified configuration: )) )) )) (( )) (( )) (( )) ((

Needless to say, high pressure is dangerous and any modifications should be carried out at your own risk, but that being said since you're removing and not adding, failure mode will likely simply be no regulator output pressure.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
mrfoo
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Afghanistan
Posts: 262
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 11:05 am
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 84 times

Tue Nov 05, 2019 12:28 pm

You could try flipping the second one from left round.

Current configuration: )) (( )) (( )) (( )) (( )) ((

Modified configuration: )) )) )) (( )) (( )) (( )) ((
That wouldn't make any difference, apart from shortening the stack (and probably opening the regulator at all times), reducing travel, and adding a "progressive" element to it (not that the latter would be much, if any, use at all in this usage).

With bellevilles, travel is defined by the number of opposing sets of washers, and force by the number of non-opposing washers in each set. There's not much use in having different numbers of washers in different parts of the stack, unless you're after a kind of progressive spring.

To reduce the force of the stack, it's easy. Create a new stack of the same length or slightly longer with only single washers opposing each other, remembering to make the ends "face out" . Like this:

)()()()()()(

That nets you half the spring force (and probably a bit more travel), and won't require more washers. It should probably be noted that this is almost certainly *not* what you want to achieve.

To make the force higher, and assuming travel is not an issue, triple up the washers. You'll need to make up the extra space with a, or several, spacers, as follows:

)))((()))(((||||

That would get you 1.5 times as much force. Quadrupling the opposing groups gets you twice as much. but correspondingly reduces the travel and will require more spacers to fit into the same space. Etc.

Bellevilles should be lightly lubricated, for HPA use I'd suggest a miniscule film of silicone grease.

As you note, HPA is dangerous, understand what you're doing and why, do it at your own risk, etc etc. If you're pissing about with the guts of a regulator, you need to understand exactly how it works, what you want to get from it, how that should happen mechanically, how you are going to do it, and how to mitigate the risk of what you are doing.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Donating Members

Tue Nov 05, 2019 2:05 pm

hat wouldn't make any difference, apart from shortening the stack (and probably opening the regulator at all times)
Wouldn't a shorter stack open the regulator less?

The idea here is to reduce the regulator output by reducing spring force.
adding a "progressive" element to it
Oh dear, we can't have that... prancing around waving rainbow flags :roll:
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
mrfoo
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Afghanistan
Posts: 262
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 11:05 am
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 84 times

Tue Nov 05, 2019 4:22 pm

My understanding of a spring based regulator, and I may well be very wrong on this, is that it's the combination of spring force and the pressure of the fluid on the output side which closes the valve, stopping flow. As pressure drops on the output side, input pressure overcomes the spring force, opens the valve, and allows fluid to flow to the output side, until pressure there rises enough to close the valve again. So to reduce pressure on the output, it is necessary to *increase* rather than decrease spring force.

Shortening the stack beyond the point where it keeps the valve in contact would mean effectively zero spring force, the only thing tending to close the valve would be pressure on the output side (which could only ever equal input side pressure anyway), and result in an unregulated output.

Like I said, though, that's based on my (probably wrong) understanding of how regulators work. I do, however, know how belleville washers work, deal with 'em all the time.
SloppyJoeES
Private
Private
United States of America
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:34 pm
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Tue Nov 05, 2019 6:28 pm

Post deleted by user.
Last edited by SloppyJoeES on Sat Sep 30, 2023 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Donating Members

Tue Nov 05, 2019 7:33 pm

Here's how a typical regulator works:

Image

As you can see, it's the spring that pushes on the piston to allow the gas to flow through, and when it reaches a certain pressure on the output side, it acts against the spring to shut off the flow. Therefore in order to have a higher output pressure, you need a stronger spring.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Moonbogg
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
United States of America
Posts: 1731
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 pm
Location: SoCal
Has thanked: 153 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Tue Nov 05, 2019 9:27 pm

800psi+ ? Yikes. I'll see myself out.
SloppyJoeES
Private
Private
United States of America
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:34 pm
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Tue Nov 05, 2019 10:21 pm

Post deleted by user.
Last edited by SloppyJoeES on Sat Sep 30, 2023 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26179
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 543 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Donating Members

Wed Nov 06, 2019 5:10 am

Moonbogg wrote:800psi+ ? Yikes. I'll see myself out.
Most commercial pneumatic air rifles operate in the 2000-3000 psi range, nothing wrong with higher pressures as long as they are safely contained. In a QEV designed for 150 psi though, it is pushing the limits.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Post Reply