hello there,
i've made a mini hybrid based on probably the most simple design available to make, and i am still having trouble with the basics.
I'm using syringe to fuel my chamber.
I measured all my chamber volume. (used a syringe)
and my spark plug gap should be o.k?, gap is around .4/.5ml piezo ignitor from portable gass grill (Slighter more juice than lighter piezo)
As you can see,
Total volume (Chamber 63ml + hose DV 12.5ml)= 75.5ml.
so,
normal- (75.5*0.032)
2X- (75.5*0.032)*2, +14.7psig (1bar)
3X- (75.5*0.032)*3, +29.4psig (2bar)
4X- (75.5*0.032)*4, 44.1psig (3bar)
5X-(75.5*0.032)*5, 58.8psig (4bar)
etc.
So with those calculations,
i got prepared for a 2X combustion.
2X = 4.8ml butane
and did the steps as following. (Fresh chamber, fresh air etc)
1. fill syringe to 10ml with lighter re-fill butane
2. take away the excess fuel untill 4.8/5 roughly (Syringe only has lines of so i had to roughly estimate.)
3. Squeezed the syringe into the front of the union (At this point the rear ball valve is open)
4. Burst disk is in place and tighten the union.
5. connect pump, and pumped the onboard pump gauge to 1bar (No leaks )
6. closed rear ball valve
7. now the chamber volume is closed down to 56mls, since the ball valve is now closed, the dead volume behind the ball valve is now insignificant and is vented with the hose bleed valve.
8. Ignite.
9. No ignition.
Take consideration the actual combustion chamber is only 56ml
as i closed the ball valve after adding 1bar so the mixture doesn't escape while disconnecting the pump hose.
Am i doing something wrong?
I've been trying for 2days now, and it's starting to get on my nerve.
re-measured my chamber volume and i get the same calculations as before.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Hybrid fueling Help/advice required
-
- Specialist
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:57 pm
- Location: New Zealand
I don't like the sound of "tightened the union as quickly as I could" (or your poor grammar and creative mixing of tenses, but I digress... ). You'd be better off filling through the air inlet (I can't tell what your inlet valve is - if it's a Schrader, switch to a male quick connect, seeing as you already have a ball valve on there).
Other than that, the potential problems I see are ignition placement (your fuel may end up concentrated closer to the breech), leakage at the rupture diaphragm (you never specified the leak rate through the union, so I can't tell for sure), and leakage during air filling with the pump, either at the pump or at the connection to the launcher.
I'm also curious about your choice of fuel mix. 3.23% will work fine, but how did you come to that choice? Considering the displacement of air from the chamber, a 2:13 butane:oxygen ratio would require 3.13% of the chamber volume in the syringe per X. Due to two factors (loss of some butane during fueling and somewhat higher deflagration pressure for a given volume of air with slight overfueling for hydrocarbons) your chosen mix will perform better than the "correct" stoichiometric mix, but I wanted to clear up any misconceptions you may have had about the fueling calculations; the 2:13 ratio and 21% oxygen gives 3.23% of the chamber volume in butane per X. The chamber fraction of butane is thus 0.0323/1.0323 = 0.0313.
Other than that, the potential problems I see are ignition placement (your fuel may end up concentrated closer to the breech), leakage at the rupture diaphragm (you never specified the leak rate through the union, so I can't tell for sure), and leakage during air filling with the pump, either at the pump or at the connection to the launcher.
I'm also curious about your choice of fuel mix. 3.23% will work fine, but how did you come to that choice? Considering the displacement of air from the chamber, a 2:13 butane:oxygen ratio would require 3.13% of the chamber volume in the syringe per X. Due to two factors (loss of some butane during fueling and somewhat higher deflagration pressure for a given volume of air with slight overfueling for hydrocarbons) your chosen mix will perform better than the "correct" stoichiometric mix, but I wanted to clear up any misconceptions you may have had about the fueling calculations; the 2:13 ratio and 21% oxygen gives 3.23% of the chamber volume in butane per X. The chamber fraction of butane is thus 0.0323/1.0323 = 0.0313.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
Your "spark plug" may be the problem.Which electrode of spark gap is hooked to brass fitting?
One electrode should be ground, to the brass fitting.
The other should be centered in the diameter of the fitting.
Here is what I am referring to.
One electrode should be ground, to the brass fitting.
The other should be centered in the diameter of the fitting.
Here is what I am referring to.
- Technician1002
- Captain
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am
A piezo is a low current device. Often the added capacitance of the insulator in the spark plug can be enough to reduce the voltage preventing a spark. With the higher chamber pressure you need a higher voltage to get a spark. The shunt (parallel) current through the insulator combined with the higher voltage requirement may be preventing ignition.
The single center electrode design adds more distance between the grounded shell which reduces the shunt capacitance leakage so I do recommend the center electrode design. Another way to reduce capacitance is to reduce the diameter of the electrode so it has less surface area where it goes through the insulation. Use as small of a diameter for this as practical. Sewing needles may help.
Your other option is to use a higher voltage and higher current ignition source such as an ignition coil or stun gun.
The single center electrode design adds more distance between the grounded shell which reduces the shunt capacitance leakage so I do recommend the center electrode design. Another way to reduce capacitance is to reduce the diameter of the electrode so it has less surface area where it goes through the insulation. Use as small of a diameter for this as practical. Sewing needles may help.
Your other option is to use a higher voltage and higher current ignition source such as an ignition coil or stun gun.
-
- First Sergeant 3
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 8:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- First Sergeant 3
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 8:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- mobile chernobyl
- Corporal 3
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:53 am
- Been thanked: 7 times
As Jeremy Clarkson would say, MOAR POWA!!!
Also I'm siding with Dewey on his refined "spark plug" proposal. Yours does appear to allow many alternate paths for stray spark breakdown-age. Maybe this is not the case... but I made sure I had no risk of that in my hybrid's "spark plug", but I also made it a little differently.
Also I'm siding with Dewey on his refined "spark plug" proposal. Yours does appear to allow many alternate paths for stray spark breakdown-age. Maybe this is not the case... but I made sure I had no risk of that in my hybrid's "spark plug", but I also made it a little differently.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26179
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 543 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
If that were an issue, none of my hybrids would have ever worked.SpudBlaster15 wrote:As I told you in my reply to your PM, and as DYI mentioned in the first paragraph of his post, you problem is almost certainly related to fueling losses during removal of the syringe and loading of the burst disk. Figure out a way to fuel through the air inlet valve, and you should achieve better results.
Does it work at 1x?
Dewey's diagram is a very good representation of what the "spak plug" ought to look like...
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life