Cannon energy contest
- Moonbogg
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
Velocity as a goal would be pretty fun. I think we would have people with small high mix hybrids shooting toothpics though. I duno, maybe this "contest" idea has its issues, I just want to do something involving the community! Its fun.
-
- Specialist 3
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:50 am
- Location: usa FL
thats no fun to hear about unless there a video about itspudamine wrote:That would be no fun, we want to see people flying backwards through the air after firing rediculously heavy projectilesi think you should all shoot the same object
a golf ball or tennis ball
or even a sock
- D_Hall
- Staff Sergeant 5
- Posts: 1920
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:37 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
That's not necessarily a bad thing.Moonbogg wrote:Velocity as a goal would be pretty fun. I think we would have people with small high mix hybrids shooting toothpics though.
Anytime you start mucking around with a contest wherein the goal is something "impressive" you start excluding people. Most people don't have access to lathes/mills. Thus, anything that requires nice machine work is beyond them. Welding? Ditto. Or anything high energy requires access to a suitable firing range. Easy for me. Not so much for some schlub who lives in the city.
So.... Want to put your ingenuity up against that of another? Then make a contest that the vast majority of people ahve the resources to compete in.
Small hybrids shooting toothpicks may very well be the ticket.
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 3 times
How about this:
fastest projectile without the use of combustion or pneumatics?
Projectile being a toothpick...
That would include everyone and show ingenuity of the builder..
fastest projectile without the use of combustion or pneumatics?
Projectile being a toothpick...
That would include everyone and show ingenuity of the builder..
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
- Moonbogg
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
That sounds interesting. A mechanical cannon velocity contest! About the lathes/mills, its been shown that high end cannons can be made without machine tools. Living in the city? Count me in! I live in the beautiful city of Whittier where land doesn't exist. I drive out to the desert.Brian the brain wrote:How about this:
fastest projectile without the use of combustion or pneumatics?
Projectile being a toothpick...
That would include everyone and show ingenuity of the builder..
-
- Private 2
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:58 pm
That does sound like a very good idea. It involves significant ingenuity not only in developing new propulsion systems, but in building a device to measure the projectile speeds accurately enough to be admissible.Brian the brain wrote:How about this:
fastest projectile without the use of combustion or pneumatics?
Projectile being a toothpick...
That would include everyone and show ingenuity of the builder
It sounds similar to my idea for a contest, which was essentially the fastest 0.2g airsoft round launcher. This standardizes the projectile, but the light weight means that launching it to decent speeds won't require tremendous amounts of energy. A toothpick would work too, but might put people without machining facilities at a larger disadvantage because of the requirement for a sabot.
I like the concept. Not sure I'd make the projectile a toothpick though, actually keeping one stable and getting a velocity measurement would be a nightmare.
Personally, if that were the competition, I wouldn't limit the projectile and would leave it up to the builder. They can go heavier if it's easier for them, but they can also go incredibly light if they'd prefer to get the velocity advantage.
Personally, if that were the competition, I wouldn't limit the projectile and would leave it up to the builder. They can go heavier if it's easier for them, but they can also go incredibly light if they'd prefer to get the velocity advantage.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
- Moonbogg
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
If standardization were to be implemented, then an airsoft round sounds about perfect, perhaps even a BB. We already know it can be done since airsoft guns often use mechanical propulsion systems. I really like this idea of using mechanical propulsion.
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 3 times
Using a plastic bb sounds fine.It also eliminates railguns..
Mechanical bb launcher, measured by ...chrony?
That leaves too many people out..
now for a standard target..knocking something back a few feet or something...styrofoam penetration perhaps?
Mechanical bb launcher, measured by ...chrony?
That leaves too many people out..
now for a standard target..knocking something back a few feet or something...styrofoam penetration perhaps?
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
-
- Private 2
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:58 pm
Using a plastic BB doesn't eliminate railguns, it would just require the use of an aluminum or copper sabot. Coilguns could be used as well, but I've not seen one that reaches high enough muzzle speeds to be competitive in such a contest. If anyone can build a railgun or ETG which could compete here, I don't see the point in excluding it.
Requiring a Chrony doesn't really leave anyone out. Any serious contestant would have one anyway, or an equivalent device.
As for targets: from what I've seen, penetration depth is not a good measure of how fast something was going. As projectiles tend to deform heavily and break apart (or even liquefy) at high impact speeds, you end up with a fairly wide-mouthed crater that isn't necessarily very deep. There's likely some relationship between mass of material ejected from the crater and the impact speed of a given projectile, but using a Chrony or equivalent seems much less prone to inaccuracy.
Requiring a Chrony doesn't really leave anyone out. Any serious contestant would have one anyway, or an equivalent device.
As for targets: from what I've seen, penetration depth is not a good measure of how fast something was going. As projectiles tend to deform heavily and break apart (or even liquefy) at high impact speeds, you end up with a fairly wide-mouthed crater that isn't necessarily very deep. There's likely some relationship between mass of material ejected from the crater and the impact speed of a given projectile, but using a Chrony or equivalent seems much less prone to inaccuracy.
- Moonbogg
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 154 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
we could use a notebook paper penetration method. To be honest, a plastic BB being flung by a mechanical system is not going to go very fast. So we could use a box o truth method simply using sheets of paper.
-
- Private 2
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:58 pm
Have we agreed that it will be restricted to mechanical launchers? If only pneumatic and combustion systems are banned, then I'd expect the majority of the entries to be electromagnetic in nature. If only mechanical systems are allowed, the speeds achieved will be low in comparison, but there may be more contestants. Perhaps two separate sections so that the more common and easily achieved mechanical systems aren't massacred by the expensive yet insanely fast EM systems?Moonbogg wrote: we could use a notebook paper penetration method. To be honest, a plastic BB being flung by a mechanical system is not going to go very fast. So we could use a box o truth method simply using sheets of paper.
I was pretty much about to suggest the splitting of categories into mechanical and electromagnetic.
No reason to exclude either possibility, but equally, they shouldn't really be competing against one another.
No reason to exclude either possibility, but equally, they shouldn't really be competing against one another.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
He never specified how many hands.D_Hall wrote:Gee... Why does it have to be hand held?
EDIT- Standardizing the projectile to an airsoft bb could be troublesome because Australia banned airsoft.
mobile chernobyl wrote:I can shoot a Canuter Valve off my '82 Chevy Ram F150 AT LEAST 3/4 Mile with 'ma cannon made of soup cans duct taped together, then I just squirt some bacardi 151 in the chamber and hold up my cigarrete lighta and WHOOSH! That thing flies at least 3/4 mile