SpudFiles

Might need some work, but here's my theory...

well I was trying to keep this a secret until I got it working.I have a very similar prototype sitting in my shop right now.I finished it last night and am testing the action today.Sorry, I beat you to it.

No, you didn't. This idea has been thought of many times over the last year or so. Probably at least 5.

i beat you to it!
i posted this on spudtech before it got shut down, its also here somewhere.


http://www.spudfiles.com/spudtech_archi ... hp?t=15861

Where did you get the crooked ass idea you were the only one to come up with this idea? As noname said, you have been beat numerous times. I personally tried, and failed. Pictures below.




Hi, you lack the common problem of not building a so called concept. If you took credit for all the so called concepts posted on here, you would have every thing from a f*cking straw, to a dog house copyrighted.

i didnt take credit for it because i knew you had bult that. i too built one and failed, and therefore scraped it to make my diaphragm gun.

mine pressureized fine, but it feed to many paint balls and they would jam up and pop in the barrel.

The difference between your built design and my design (besides the fact that one actually exists) is that the top part where rounds are loaded into is threaded with a threaded endcap.

By the way, why did yours fail?

Wow pimp, your cannon looks very nice. Why did it fail?

the things on a pressure pot for a spray rig is what i am going to use on mine.



theyre simpler than anatovs design and allow for piston servicing too. They also are cheaper, and taste better too

Fellas I said similar.I did mine different then your ideas.Don't get a whiny!I know its not new.But the way I'm doing it will solve the problems.And I DID beat anatov to it.

Oh my bloody god...I never said I was the first to do anything like this, in fact, I was counting on it. I simply posted an idea, hoping to get feedback as to whether or not it would work, not who built it first. I seriously think that that isn't the issue, I think if you guys stop fighting over who did what first, you could probably compare your results and ideas and actually get a decent co-axial built.

Anatov, whining is the nature of the beast around here.When this many kids get together they all want to be reassured of themselves.And they do that by squabbling over who thought what up first.Unless of course it actually is entirely a first and too complicated for them to understand.

And no I was never bashing you anatov.I hope you build yours and make it a success.

I didn't say you were bashing me or anything, I just thought that the forums would be more helpful. This is why I haven't really posted that much.

It's like a flea market.There are nuggets to be found but you have to sift through a lot of garbage.And the bashing thing I just wanted to make sure you didn't think I was bashing you.Typing makes it hard to express intentions.Any who back on topic...yes it will probably work with the proper modification that's always needed when building.One way to find out,go build it.