The Pneumatic Takeover

Voice your input! Discuss anything to do with SpudFiles.com or community it's self. Constructive discussions only. This is a place to express thoughts about making the community better.
User avatar
archie370
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 7:02 pm
Location: US

Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:17 pm

Haha I was stating my opinion u can 2
‎"what happens in Vegas, stays in vegas!.... Except herpes, that shit'll come back with you"
User avatar
velocity3x
Corporal 4
Corporal 4
Posts: 828
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: Yuma, Arizona
Contact:

Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:58 am

Actualy, I don't see either one (Combustion vs Pneumatic) as being any more dangerous than the other if engineered / constructed properly and operated within the design limitations.
User avatar
JDP12
Staff Sergeant 5
Staff Sergeant 5
Posts: 1943
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:34 pm

Mon Oct 29, 2012 12:13 pm

archie-- your "opinion", while it is your own.... is founded upon facts that are simply wrong. as people have stated multiple times, too much fuel will lead to nothing happening... fuel needs to be at a very precise percentage of the chamber volume in order to ignite.

I suggest you do some reading on the wiki and around the forums and you'll find that pneumatics and combustions both can be dangerous... especially when people like you build guns based on little prior knowledge.
"Some say his pet elephant is pink, and that he has no understanding of "PG rated forum". All we know is, he's called JSR. "
User avatar
archie370
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 7:02 pm
Location: US

Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:27 pm

Fair enough bud :)
‎"what happens in Vegas, stays in vegas!.... Except herpes, that shit'll come back with you"
Post Reply