Pnuematic + Water = More Power?

A place for general potato gun questions and discussion.
icemanxxxv
Recruit
Recruit
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:55 am

What if you added water to the barrel behind the projectile. Or in the chamber infront of the pressure charge?
User avatar
blind909
Corporal 4
Corporal 4
Posts: 828
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 6:06 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Contact:

It Wouldnt give it any more power, it would give it less, since water is much heavier than air, it will take more time to reach the end of the barrel.
<a href="http://www.danasoft.com"><img src="http://www.danasoft.com/citysign.jpg" border="0"></a><div>
THIS STATES WHERE YOU LIVE, NOT ME, IT SAYS WHERE YOU LIVE BASED ON YOUR IP ADRESS.
brogdenlaxmiddie
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 562
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 2:19 pm

It would also have a lot of recoil. If I'm right, (please tell me if I am wrong) that the more recoil, the more energy is being used to move the gun backwards. This falls into the theory that there is always an equal opposite reaction to every action. So, If it has more recoil, then more of the energy is being transfered to the water(causing more recoil), as apposed as the round. Less energy to the round= less impressive reults from it.
User avatar
Hubb
First Sergeant 2
First Sergeant 2
Posts: 2390
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 8:39 am
Location: South Georgia
Contact:

Everyone of my pneumatics I've built, I've put water in the barrel. The recoil is massive compared to its intended uses.

All the water is going to do (besides take away from the power) is act as a wadding, maybe.
icemanxxxv
Recruit
Recruit
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:55 am

Thanks all for your imput!
User avatar
SpudFarm
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Posts: 2571
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:39 am
Location: Norway Trondheim area

i have chronyed water..
it goes slower without a potato as wadding so i don't think it will act as wadding for other projectiles
"Made in France"
- A spud gun insurance.
User avatar
bob-a-lu
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:24 pm
Location: alabama

@brogden it would give it more recoil cuz its heavier and adjusts to whatever surrounds it.(i think)
SEAKING9006
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:20 pm
Location: Texas

brogdenlaxmiddie wrote:It would also have a lot of recoil. If I'm right, (please tell me if I am wrong) that the more recoil, the more energy is being used to move the gun backwards. This falls into the theory that there is always an equal opposite reaction to every action. So, If it has more recoil, then more of the energy is being transfered to the water(causing more recoil), as apposed as the round. Less energy to the round= less impressive reults from it.
You are exactly correct. Not properly bracing your body when firing a recoil-operated firearm (especially shotguns) can easily cause it to short-stroke.
Completed projects:
CA1 SMSS Basic Inline
CA3 PDAB Airburst Cannon

Current Project: Bolt action rifle (25x140mm + 1in shot)
User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10078
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Been thanked: 3 times

icemanxxxv wrote:Or in the chamber infront of the pressure charge?
If you add water to the chamber the only thing it will do is make your chamber volume smaller. Since water is pretty much incompressable, it's just taking up room in your chamber. So you end up with a smaller, heavier chamber. It wouldn't do any good.

The only way it works is like any bottle rockets. When the water is at the bottom near the exit and the air pressure is above it, this forces the water out sending the bottle sky high, pointless for us spudders.
SEAKING9006
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:20 pm
Location: Texas

I don't know about pointless.... Eventually somebody's gonna find a use for it.
Completed projects:
CA1 SMSS Basic Inline
CA3 PDAB Airburst Cannon

Current Project: Bolt action rifle (25x140mm + 1in shot)
brogdenlaxmiddie
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 562
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 2:19 pm

SEAKING9006 wrote:I don't know about pointless.... Eventually somebody's gonna find a use for it.
Agreed, yet at the current status, useless. So how about you come up with a use for it and impliment it so that we'll be wrong. 8)
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post