boyntonstu wrote:inonickname wrote:TurboSuper wrote:I'm a bit confused. It seems like in the first test he doesn't connect the output of the HHO cell and in the second one he does, but in both tests he's powering the HHO cell nonetheless. What does that prove? That connecting the cell wastes less energy than not connecting it?
I haven't seen the video, but I'll hazard a guess that it creates a win-win situation for this rubbish HHO term. He's wasting the same amount of energy in each "experiment", but in one he gets a tiny fraction back.
Simply, scam.
Wow!
Imagine what your opinion would be if you actually saw the videos.
I may be wrong, so please don't present me with any facts.
People who have strong opinions don't need any data.
I am a skeptic and if you read my comment to his videos you would see my objections based on math and logic.
BoyntonStu
It just won't work, ever.
By reading what he said, it was obvious what happens.
Lets say he wastes 5% of the energy each trial (not really a realistic number, but for the sake of argument). In the trial "without "HHO"" he's still wasting the energy, which makes a bad name for not using HHO to begin with. Then he connects the cell back up, and gets almost .5% of that 5% of energy back!
Brilliant, that just proved HHO is an awesome fuel in a completely biased and incorrect test. Of course, I may have misinterpreted this statement completely wrong:
"It seems like in the first test he doesn't connect the output of the HHO cell and in the second one he does, but in both tests he's powering the HHO cell nonetheless"
Unless he made that up, or something was misunderstood I stand by my original statement as being correct.