Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:32 am
14 days to go, should have something by then. nice comp
Your Spud Cannon Community
https://www.spudfiles.com/
Double posts are alright if you need to bump a topic up because you have something new for it. Also if it's been more then a day, double post anything you want as long as it isn't spam.jrrdw wrote:If this turns out to be a double post, I tryed to delete the above ^!!!
This is my shot. Nothing spectacular, keep your eye on the bottom right corner of the cushion. You can't see the ball, (I can't you mite be able to) but the cushion moves.
Enjoy!
The Basterd!
Like I said, nothing spectacular.
thats not really fair, you should use random number selection to choose the judges for the top 6 entriesclide wrote:Judging will happen in a poll, so everyone gets a say. If there are a lot of entries there will be then a list of the top 6 will be made by me and a few other respected members who I have yet to choose. Then only the top 6 will be in the poll. This will all happen after the deadline. Hopefully it will all be complete around a week after the deadline (January 31)
Song is 'I'D love to change the world' by Ten Years After. The cushion is the pale square thing that twichs rite after you hear the shot go off. It looks good in Windows Media Player, specialy if you change the play speed to slow.mtronic wrote:jrrdw: liked the song(ps could you tell me what it was) and the pic of the BasterdBut I couldn't see the cushion at all
![]()
This comps getting interesting 8)
holy busted blue balls batman!!!! Thats dedication!I sifted through 3 1/2 hours of video to come up with it.
thanks mate 8) Feel free to watch my other youtube vids and comment:) Im working on a new dmg round with high penetration...giggidy. Are you going to enter a vid? If you have one, post it and support SF and my love of destroying things at high speeds :violent3:mtronic that shot was pretty badass as well lol the stereo got F@#$ed up, nice
How is that not fair? I think specifically choosing people who I think can make unbiased decisions is more likely to get good results than randomly choosing people. Plus its less of a hassle. Unless you have a really good reason why that isn't fair then it is not going to change.ALIHISGREAT wrote:thats not really fair, you should use random number selection to choose the judges for the top 6 entriesclide wrote: If there are a lot of entries there will be then a list of the top 6 will be made by me and a few other respected members who I have yet to choose. Then only the top 6 will be in the poll.
well you might be bias in your picking of the unbias (in your opinion) people... random selection is the way forewardHow is that not fair? I think specifically choosing people who I think can make unbiased decisions is more likely to get good results than randomly choosing people. Plus its less of a hassle. Unless you have a really good reason why that isn't fair then it is not going to change.