Page 10 of 443
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:46 pm
by Labtecpower
@ Boyntonstu
If you want to discuss young boy's testicles, you should go somewhere else.
Thank you.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:50 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Selador wrote:Ok, what am I going to have to trade you for HER ?
They really aren't that difficult to obtain, if you don't beat them they think you're a hopeless romantic
Labtecpower wrote:@ Ramses:

seconded hehe!
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:56 pm
by Selador
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:
They really aren't that difficult to obtain, if you don't beat them they think you're a hopeless romantic

As long as I can tuck her somewhere out of hearing, whenever necessary.
Otherwise the expense isn't justified.
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Labtecpower wrote:@ Boyntonstu
seconded hehe!
Thirdeded
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:56 pm
by boyntonstu
Labtecpower wrote:@ Boyntonstu
If you want to discuss young boy's testicles, you should go somewhere else.
Thank you.
That is a low blow.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:04 pm
by jrrdw
@Your boys testicals, @Low blows...
Members flaming each other?
This thread going once!
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:05 pm
by Labtecpower
I just want to end this discussion. listen to the mods.
I remember one discussion about using grains or grams.
It was endless, and you just don't want to see someone elses opinion.
Maybe there is some reli-forum somewhere. go there if you want to talk about this.
Here I just want to have fun, and discuss spud guns.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:06 pm
by MrCrowley
[youtube][/youtube]
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:09 pm
by Labtecpower
I'm not gonna watch that, my father just bought "the meaning of live DVD"

Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:10 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Forum debates about religion are futile. Anyone interested in the question is well advised to look some up some
serious debates where the more scholarly address the issue with sound arguments based on current knowledge.
I fall firmly on one side of the fence, but I don't see the point of trying to convince anyone to follow my point of view on a discussion forum centred largely on accelerating groceries
Labtecpower wrote:I'm not gonna watch that, my father just bought "the meaning of live DVD"

The conclusion they reach at the end of that makes sense

Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:15 pm
by jrrdw
Whats up with the Youtube server? Hate it when a "Error accures please try again later".
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:30 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Selador wrote:Otherwise the expense isn't justified.
No expenses involved, just good old passive aggression thinly disguised as charm
On a related note, Google ads seems to have picked up on the theme lolol!
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:32 pm
by boyntonstu
They really aren't that difficult to obtain, if you don't beat them they think you're a hopeless romantic Very Happy
Is beating a woman appropriate discussion?
I don't think that it is funny at all.
Totally inappropriate.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:43 pm
by Ragnarok
boyntonstu wrote:Were you aware of the fact that until recent times the Catholic Church encouraged the castration of young boys so that their voices would remain soprano?
I'm not sure they stopped. Have you heard Michael Bublé?
~~~~~
Look, Stu...
Off-topic chatty threads are intended to help a sense of camaraderie between members, not drive a wedge between them. Challenging member's deeply held beliefs is going to create rivalries this forum doesn't need.
I feel strongly on the matter of religion myself, but I know there is a time and a place to discuss these things, and Spudfiles is not it.
If you feel compelled to talk about such potentially controversial subjects, please do it somewhere where it's actually encouraged.
You may feel hurt, insulted or whatever, but just leave it. You don't have to get the last say in every situation.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:45 pm
by boyntonstu
Have you visited the "Large Teat National Park"?
Geography
Grand Teton, at 13,775 feet (4,199 m),[1] is the high point of the Teton Range, and the second highest peak in the U.S. state of Wyoming. The mountain is entirely within the Snake River drainage basin, which it feeds by several local creeks and glaciers.[4]
Grand Teton's name was first recorded as Mount Hayden by the Washburn-Langford-Doane Expedition of 1870. But by 1931, the name Grand Teton Peak was in such common usage that it was recognized by the USGS Board on Geographic Names. Another shift in usage led the Board to shorten the name on maps to Grand Teton in 1970.[3]
Grand Teton Highest mountain in the Teton Range. Named by French trappers. Upon viewing the Teton Range from the west, the trappers dubbed the South, Middle, and Grand, Les Trois Tetons, meaning ”the three breasts.”
The origin of the current name is controversial. The most common explanation is that "Grand Teton" means "large teat" in French, named by either French-Canadian or Iroquois members of an expedition led by Donald McKenzie of the North West Company.[5] However, other historians disagree, and claim that the mountain was named after the Teton Sioux tribe of Native Americans.[6]
edit by MrCrowley:
If you feel compelled to talk about such potentially controversial subjects, please do it somewhere where it's actually encouraged.
Is discussion of beating a women controversial?
Is it to be encouraged?
I give you the last word.
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:52 pm
by MrCrowley
Last word on this subject is right here. I know some of you will want to reply to what Boyn just said, myself being one of them, but from experience I think we all know best to leave it alone and ignore what he says on the subject.
Edit: Further replies on this matter will be deleted without notification.