Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:42 pm
its the same i made a 1" piston with a 1/2 barrel and i see no change in power. that gun is now dead i needed parts and that gun had the part i needed 
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:48 pm
Ok, that sounds good, i can probably use a lot of the parts from my failed coaxial piston, this may be a great alternative for me!
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:58 pm
Pilot volume is on the huge side but you also have a massive pilot valve so I guess the power is still there. Use up all your air, there are unpressurised kids in India! 
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:04 am
thats a good one jack. and i know it is a little bigger than what i wanted but then like you said i have a "massive" pilot valve so its all good. and i will get some more pics up to day.Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:00 pm
OMG, Jack, you anomoly about Americans came true.... OUch! (For the record I am American.) But, this doesn't look purposeful, like in your description.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:19 pm
Why did you use the union? It's totally unnecessary and is just another $10 out of your wallet...
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:00 pm
what a wonderful gun now i want to try one
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:02 pm
nope iv had it for almost 4 months now so i thought why spend more money if i have this. and i like the it looks this way.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:11 pm
That pilot volume is absolutely incredibly small. You are all comparing it to something piloted by a blowgun, but his is piloted by a 1" sprinkler valve. His valve is probably one of the fastest opeing on this site... You try piloting a 1/2 inch valve with a 1" valve, it will open fast
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:15 pm
why thank you but i don't think its the "fastest" but it is fast very fast.
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:16 pm
how did you fill it up, quick connect, shrader, or what, i dont see anything.
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:29 pm
that's pretty cool.
diaphragm valves are nifty!
diaphragm valves are nifty!