Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:18 am
muzzlebrakes
there is plenty of debate on whether or not they make a firearm louder(as in decibels). the more efficient brakes channel exhaust gases rearward, this will provide a forward thrust of the firearm, thus reducing recoil. the redirected gases are what create the perceived increase in noise. depending on where you are standing the noise could be greater or lesser. behind the muzzle would be louder than in front of it.
somethings to keep in mind with muzzlebrakes. the smaller the bore of the rifle the more effective the brake will be. the larger the case/chamber capacity, the higher the muzzle pressure will be and the more effective the brake will work at decreasing felt recoil.
i could see a brake working better on a .75" pneumatic than a standard 1.5" combustion
there is plenty of debate on whether or not they make a firearm louder(as in decibels). the more efficient brakes channel exhaust gases rearward, this will provide a forward thrust of the firearm, thus reducing recoil. the redirected gases are what create the perceived increase in noise. depending on where you are standing the noise could be greater or lesser. behind the muzzle would be louder than in front of it.
somethings to keep in mind with muzzlebrakes. the smaller the bore of the rifle the more effective the brake will be. the larger the case/chamber capacity, the higher the muzzle pressure will be and the more effective the brake will work at decreasing felt recoil.
i could see a brake working better on a .75" pneumatic than a standard 1.5" combustion