Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:03 pm
by MrCrowley
BigGrib wrote:the pressure rating for a soda bottle is STUPID or in danish Dumb Ass. Go to the sponsor fo spudfiles BC ARMS and they will have everything you need.
Easy on the Danish guy now :wink:

Yeah if you can fork out the cost for shipping i'm sure BC Pneumatics who runs BC ARMS would be more then happy to ship to you.

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:50 am
by Hangover
YAY!! I found something! Now I can start building.. But there is something called a muff (word?) and a "bøsning" (word?). Both are reduction pipes, but the "bøsning" is cheaper (wtf :? ?). What's the difference (except for the price)?

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:54 am
by bigbob12345
By bosning do you mean bushing

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:07 pm
by Hangover
bigbob12345 wrote:By bosning do you mean bushing
I don't know.. But it's highly possible :thumbright: Maybe these pictures will help..

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:21 pm
by Hotwired
Okeydoke :)

A *muff* appears to be a reducer and a *bøsning* is a bushing

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:58 pm
by Hangover
And i should be using a reducer for reducing the size of pipe, right?

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:00 pm
by Hangover
Anyone? Should i use a bushing or reducer for my chamber (going from 4" chamber to 1/2" valve)

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:02 pm
by cwazy1
arent reducers usually dwv??

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:14 pm
by bluerussetboy
you should use the bosning/bushing.

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:48 pm
by MrCrowley
You should use the bushing because reducers are usually DWV, but yours looks like it's pressure rated.

So I would still use the bushing as it's cheaper and looks better.

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:33 pm
by sjog
Flush Bushing is what's needed<img src="http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o12/ ... G_0138.jpg" border="0"><img src="http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o12/ ... 0169_3.jpg" border="0"> These are both flush bushings, different applications<img src="http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o12/ ... G_0168.jpg" border="0">