first coaxial plans

Cannons powered by pneumatic pressure (compressed gas) using a valve or other release.
User avatar
jrrdw
Moderator
Moderator
United States of America
Posts: 6572
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Maryland
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 22 times
Contact:

Wont that union hold the diaphram in one place? Thus not allowing it to move, keeping it from working?
sandman
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 672
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:59 pm

the diaphragm is flexible so it can stretch, hence why sprinkler valves work :wink:
User avatar
jrrdw
Moderator
Moderator
United States of America
Posts: 6572
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Maryland
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 22 times
Contact:

sandman wrote:the diaphragm is flexible so it can stretch, hence why sprinkler valves work :wink:
Wont it be clamped all the way around? It has to let the pilot chamber vent.
sandman
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 672
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:59 pm

jrrdw wrote: Wont it be clamped all the way around? It has to let the pilot chamber vent.
a sprinkler valve is clamped all the way around :roll:
and when it vents the force stretches it back and allows the air into the barrel
User avatar
BigJon
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:21 pm

The diaphragm is accually a little bigger than the diameter of the union so it can move back and forth a little bit i think. Kinda hard to explain so sorry if you don't understand.
Easterbunny
Private
Private
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:24 pm

would it be easier and peform better to make it a piston insted? somthing like an end cap with a rubber disk , bolt washer and a nut. put a couple of holes in the endcap for airflow. here
Attachments
piston.JPG
User avatar
BigJon
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:21 pm

If you use the piston method you won't need to drill holes in the endcap (piston) unless it is absolutely air tight. I also think a piston would be easier to make but thats just me.
Easterbunny
Private
Private
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:24 pm

would this piston work?
User avatar
BigJon
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:21 pm

If you want a piston valve have a look at this since your chamber is 3"http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/3-piston-t313.html
Easterbunny
Private
Private
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:24 pm

thank you, how much movment should i allow for it?
sandman
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 672
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:59 pm

i think the formula is use 1/4 of the diameter of the piston
User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10078
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Been thanked: 3 times

Barrel diameter, not piston :wink:
sandman
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 672
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:59 pm

wouldn't the Piston OD and the Barrel ID be the same thing?
Easterbunny
Private
Private
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:24 pm

ok here is the updated plans, i hope to make the body tube removeable to service the launcher if it is nesscary with a pistion
Attachments
pnumatic at4.JPG
User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10078
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Been thanked: 3 times

sandman wrote:wouldn't the Piston OD and the Barrel ID be the same thing?
No otherwise the piston wouldn't work :wink:

And if the piston O.D = Barrel I.D wouldn't the piston go inside the barrel :P

The piston needs an exposed area that has pressure forcing it back, that's why pistons work so well.

So the O.D of the piston could be say 8cm and the I.D of the seat(barrel) could be 7cm.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post