SpudFiles

jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:seriously, go to bed hehe

anything apart from blood is bad in the bloodstream.

And how much blood do you have flowing through your alcohol at the moment?

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.......ha....ha.ha.ha.ha.

Did you all watch the video?
If not- http://www.waspknife.com/video_watermelon.php

One can only imagine> "WASP Injection Knife vs. Human Head"

jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:seriously, go to bed hehe

anything apart from blood is bad in the bloodstream.

And how much blood do you have flowing through your alcohol at the moment?

Heheeheehehee me hit my sack now, then bed

Oh dear.

And in the interest of forum etiquette, perhaps the less than sober spamming should cease here

Then bed eh?

Poor sack.

you guys are taking this as its supposed to be used on people no its supposed to be used on animals when there is an animal attack no one in there right mind would use this on a person it would no doubt kill them

brother361 wrote:No one in there right mind would use this on a person it would no doubt kill them

Well, if you're stabbing someone, that's usually the general idea

On their site doesn't it say that it is the next advanced weapon for soldiers? To kill enemies? People?

I can't really see it being effective for soldiers. The good, old fashioned Ka-bar seems to do quite well (or the other knifes for non-Americans). I mean, thrusting a 8 inch blade through the breast bone of someone or pulling the edge across the jugular seems to be very effective in "stopping a threat." Injecting CO2 is going to do nothing more than add insult to injury (or make a really big mess). Then you have to reload the cartridge?

I can, however, see this being very effective in hunting and diving for defensive purposes. Bear attack? Shark attack? Whatever.

It has multiple burst of co2 like a co2 inflator.

Next version will run on unregged hpa. 8)

Version after that will be a burst disk hybrid.

Ha-ha

jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:

brother361 wrote:No one in there right mind would use this on a person it would no doubt kill them

Well, if you're stabbing someone, that's usually the general idea

A prize for Captain Obvious!

Hmm, interesting, but I do have my doubts - I wouldn't be that surprised if it was banned as inhumane pretty quickly.

Besides, I although can see it as very useful for say, a diver - surely hunters (and soldiers, while I'm at it) would have more effective, and longer range, things to resort to?
If you're hunting something that requires something more complex than a normal knife to stop it, firstly, I wouldn't want to have to wait for it to get that close, and secondly, presumably you'd have a rifle or some other firearm anyway? I mean, what exactly were you hunting with in the first place?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fa ... _by_decade

The link should clear up any hunters. Bears and other wildlife attack at close range, where a rifle is usually no good.

I saw that on a tv show. It said that they weren't mass producing it because they thought that some school kid or a criminal would find a way to get their ands on one.

Ragnarok wrote:Hmm, interesting, but I do have my doubts - I wouldn't be that surprised if it was banned as inhumane pretty quickly.

The daily mail's already thrown up a fuss

I think the point here is to maximise lethality if all you're carrying is a knife - it's being marketed as something you'd use if you were attacked at close range, not really as an offensive tool.

dudeman508 wrote:It said that they weren't mass producing it because they thought that some school kid or a criminal would find a way to get their ands on one.

Well, now that we know how the idea works, it doesn't make much know-how to hook up a CO₂ tyre inflator to a sharpened tube et voila.

It does kind of remove the idea of a knife as a silent weapon though, *pop*