I was referencing the very original post. No blow gun was mentioned but it is in the photo of the cannon in the original link in the very original post.dewey-1 wrote:Tech this is why I am confused.Technician1002 wrote:I don't.dewey-1 wrote:I agree with jrrdw.
I have used a 1 inch sprinkler to pilot a 1.5 inch sprinkler valve.
I had to because the blow gun was to restrictive on the larger valve.
Look here;
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtop ... tml#127106
The blow gun was the hint the equalization leakage is high. Too high.
I made the statement of a restrictive blow gun on my cannon.
It has nothing to do with resrictive blowgun on his! He never even stated that.
I thought you were stating that I also had a bad or messed up main valve
because of your reference to "blow gun was the hint"
I could have used a ball valve but they are inconvenient and ugly for the purpose I wanted. That is to have a trigger handle.
To make matters worse, there is an elbow in both the pilot for the sprinkler valve and an elbow on the discharge of the sprinkler valve. I made a guess to the addition of the latter made a change in operation. I may be completely off base on this one. Too many variables and much confusion on which elbow. In providing the back pressure to the sprinkler valve, I was referencing the PVC one on the left.


