Page 2 of 3
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:26 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
wyz2285 wrote:So it is possible to make the helsing

Hehe believe it or not I was thinking that recently!
I could make 5 of these, and put them on a revolving chassis...

Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:41 pm
by Alanstone
While we are on the topic of a projectile center of gravity, I have a design consideration. A hollow projectile driven by a pusher ( plus you can play add infinitum with the projectile dynamic) . Low mass, little drag vs large barrel diameter. Is there any merit to this? I was sure I had found the holy grail half way into a bottle of rum. The next day I wasn't so sure.
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:49 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:58 pm
by wyz2285
Hehe believe it or not I was thinking that recently!
Believe or not I was building it recently, but as I was fitting the arrows over a smaller diameter tube, barrel strength was a problem. But now I can confidently use conventional projectile inside barrel configuration. (actually I asked if I could and somebody have said no

)
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 3:08 pm
by Alanstone
You'd need rifling for them to fly straight though...
That must depend on design surely?
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:24 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Alanstone wrote:That must depend on design surely?
Having air flow through the projectile would preclude drag stabilisation, you'd have to put fins on it.
That's the theory but since I believe in science by doing, whipped up a quick test projectile with a heavier brass nose and aluminium tail, hollowed out.
The cross marks the centre of gravity, as a solid projectile it should have flown straight. As you can see though, fired at a cardboard box just 5 metres away, it was clearly tumbling.
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 5:32 pm
by dewey-1
JSR
Plug the brass end with Delrin nose piece to verify that being hollow is actually the problem!
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:22 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
dewey-1 wrote:Plug the brass end with Delrin nose piece to verify that being hollow is actually the problem!
Right you are, I forgot control group A!
I didn't do it because of previous experience with similar projectiles but yes, for completeness' sake it should be done, eventually when I get home.
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:44 pm
by Alanstone
Thank for the links to the ammo JSR. I didn't know it existed. As to my proposed idea (the drawing I did) I thought about the projectile needing fins especially because its short with a large diameter. That's why, in the drawing you see material inside at the back of the projectile in my drawing. I thought that perhaps that would create the drag needed to stabilize it. Especially if it was designed to induce spin. Do you think that if the projectile had an airofoil shape it would help stabilize the projectile? That and fins inside the back of the projectile. It would probably have to be the other way round though ( with the inside fins at the front of the projectile to put the cg forward rather than create drag. I don't know.

My mind keeps showing me an airofoil shape, like a stretched teardrop as a profile shape. I wish I had a 3d printer. What do you think Dewey? Would an airofoil profile help stabilize the profile? Could fins inside the projectile make it spin?
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:39 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:10 am
by Alanstone
Thanks for the link JSR. I am starting to get used to the idea that all my "new and innovative" thoughts are old hat! I lolled at myself this morning.

Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 1:45 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Alanstone wrote:Thanks for the link JSR. I am starting to get used to the idea that all my "new and innovative" thoughts are old hat!
That's why it's good to research - you have an unbelievably extensive world of knowledge unprecedented in human history at your fingertips, use it
It amazes me how businesses give their employees internet access and expect them to work

Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 4:55 am
by Alanstone
Fair enough. In my defense I must say I naively believed I had stumbled onto something unique.
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 5:03 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 10:21 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Further to the "cookie cutter" test, as dewey suggested I plugged the nose of the projectile with some foam to give practically identical CG but a closed tube shape and shot it at the same target, two sides of a carboard box. As you can see it was clearly travelling nose first.