Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 pm
by MrCrowley
Heimo wrote:Brian the brain wrote:
"What's wrong with being arrogant when you're right"
Nothing really but it might irritate some people... BUT I know lots of guys who are wrong about some things and then they are arrogant about it too, that is the type of person that irritates me
It's a joke
Everyone who is arrogant, thinks they are right.

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:39 pm
by Brian the brain
Air-ogance airittates...
Peer ranking would solve that.
If you suc...I mean vacume....you'll end up with a low rank.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:04 pm
by rcman50166
Well I'm not sure how big you want the images for each merit. But I was thinking I could make them. I had small 50x50 px images in mind.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:15 pm
by Heimo
MrCrowley wrote:Heimo wrote:Brian the brain wrote:
"What's wrong with being arrogant when you're right"
Nothing really but it might irritate some people... BUT I know lots of guys who are wrong about some things and then they are arrogant about it too, that is the type of person that irritates me
It's a joke
Everyone who is arrogant, thinks they are right.

OK But what I ment is that there are some guys out there in my school spesificly that thinks every thing they say is correct and then they try and argue with you about it when you know you are right but lucky it is hard to lose a argument if you are right anyway what I tried to say is someone who's got a nasty attitude does not bother me too much if they got their facts streight but they irritate me if they they argue about things they know nothing about
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:29 pm
by deathbyDWV
Well we were kinda gonna scrap the idea since most people are saying it won't catch on... but i'll still put them up! I think the size and idea are good. I like it.
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:16 pm
by jrrdw
deathbyDWV wrote:Well we were kinda gonna scrap the idea since most people are saying it won't catch on... but i'll still put them up! I think the size and idea are good. I like it.
I wonder how many cannons would have been built if every time 1 to 3 members disagreed with the design they decided not to build? :dontknow: :tongue3:
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:38 pm
by deathbyDWV
Hmm... Good point jrrdw...
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:34 am
by inonickname
chinnerz wrote:chinnerz plays games, and one part of playing games for me is belonging to a clan, i have helped build 2 websites and for one of them we ended up doing something very similar to this.... within 2 weeks nobody cared about it any more... srsly wasn’t worth the effort.
However we did use the ranks, and we also ended up changing the stars to different medals if you are planning on doing this i recon that was the easiest way to do it.
Hmm..idea for the whole forum game:
http://combatarms.nexon.net/
Free, not
massive requirements (but still fairly high), easy to play, decent clan/friends system so we can get a game setup quickly.
If you guys want to do this, lets see how many people can run it. If it turns out to be a little high we can go with a counterstrike or cube style game.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:55 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
MrCrowley wrote:Everyone who is arrogant, thinks they are right.

The problem is that when people are right, they often come across as arrogant. That was Atkins' point, as an atheist professor (and star of one of my
favourite debates 
)
Brian the buttocks wrote:Stop kissing my B-hind
I wasn't

besides if I were to try my mouth would likely run dry before I even covered 2% of it
