SpudFiles

that ratings system sounds heaps good, i would use that

but then it comes down to how you "rate" a gun, do you base your system on design, looks, performance or what?

chinnerz wrote:but then it comes down to how you "rate" a gun, do you base your system on design, looks, performance or what?

That's down to the individual, there are some cool launcers with low power, ugly launchers with amazing performance, and average launchers that are brilliantly finished - all deserving of a good rating - so imposing criteria would be unfair.

hmm i guess your right (as always)

JSR wrote: "random cannon" feature is certainly useful.

yeah, but then you have some people who used photo bucket as their image host, so we can no longer see their works... (sadface)