New Hybrid design

Harnessing precision mixtures of pressurized flammable vapor. Not for the beginner.
User avatar
boyce123
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: North Bend, Washington

the rear endcap shouldn't be a worry, as its just the end of the pilot chamber, i plan on reinforcing the back of the cap to take the impact of the piston. The front "cap" (a bell reducer to a bushing reducer) will at least be contained/covered by the 4" pvc then further heavily reinforced. The only safety issue i could see at a safe mix is the front cap blowing out, but it is containted, so the shrapnel would theoretically go forward.
User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10078
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Been thanked: 3 times

To carry on my suggestion from the SCH 40 vs ABS thread, what about fibre glassing the PVC and ignoring the other sleeving? It could be expensive and might be a bit difficult to do by yourself but I would think it would be easier to calculate its yield strength and such.
User avatar
boyce123
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: North Bend, Washington

i was thinking of reinforcing the front end with fiberglass, would a layer of fiberglass be stronger than the extra sleeve of sch 40. i have already sleeved the inside with the copper pipe, the copper will also add a very good piston surface (over the irregular pvc).
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26219
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 347 times

boyce123 wrote:the copper will also add a very good piston surface (over the irregular pvc).
I've had the opposite experience, but perhaps the copper I was using had been abused.
boyce123 wrote:The only safety issue i could see at a safe mix is the front cap blowing out, but it is containted, so the shrapnel would theoretically go forward.
Welcome to the hybrid way of thinking :D

[youtube][/youtube]
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
boyce123
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: North Bend, Washington

is that schedual 80 pvc as the chamber...
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26219
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 347 times

No idea what the US equivalent size is but it's roughly 1" OD and 3/4" ID PVC. The chamber holds up just fine even up to 8x:

[youtube][/youtube]

... what blew up was the cast epoxy breech :D
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
boyce123
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 12:29 pm
Location: North Bend, Washington

ah... it is schedual 80 (should hold up to around 700 psi), seems as if the epoxy should have held up...
what kind of pressures do you think your getting out of 8x with pipe that small

I have a single click bbq igniter, how many x's would this be able to function in, if it would be unreliable, i have access to cheap stun guns.

I currently have a 6 ft barrel, its kind of ridiculous for the size of the gun, i'm unfamiliar with hybrid ratios for chamber to barrel, would it cut much on permformance if i cut the barrel down a bit.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26219
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 347 times

boyce123 wrote:ah... it is schedual 80 (should hold up to around 700 psi), seems as if the epoxy should have held up...
The breech was unsupported and cast into a sheet copper structure that offered little in the way of additional strength. This means that while the cartridge itself held, once the pressure got into the breech area it couldn't take it.
what kind of pressures do you think your getting out of 8x with pipe that small
In this case I wasn't using a burst disk but a friction seal, so I doubt there was more than a couple of hundred psi in the chamber.
I have a single click bbq igniter, how many x's would this be able to function in, if it would be unreliable, i have access to cheap stun guns.
I've used piezo ignitors from cigarette lighters at up to 17x, the important thing is that the spark gap is really, really small, 0.5mm or less.
I currently have a 6 ft barrel, its kind of ridiculous for the size of the gun, i'm unfamiliar with hybrid ratios for chamber to barrel, would it cut much on permformance if i cut the barrel down a bit.
With the sort of pressure that hybrids generate, unless you have a microscopic chamber or working at very low mixes, it's hard to conceive of a barrel that is too long.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • 6mm hybrid design
    by jackssmirkingrevenge » » in Hybrid Cannons
    31 Replies
    10807 Views
    Last post by jackssmirkingrevenge
  • New hybrid design
    by daxspudder » » in Hybrid Cannons
    1 Replies
    3017 Views
    Last post by mark.f
  • Hybrid QDV Design
    by saefroch » » in Hybrid Cannons
    12 Replies
    2650 Views
    Last post by saefroch
  • Hybrid design
    by Gunner » » in Hybrid Cannons
    17 Replies
    5575 Views
    Last post by SpudFarm
  • New hybrid design
    by pat123 » » in Hybrid Cannons
    16 Replies
    5504 Views
    Last post by Jared Haehnel