Page 2 of 4
Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:10 pm
by Blitz
Sometimes, yep! But often the fun for me is just throwing something together.

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:56 pm
by duane
dart guy wrote:You should have an air chamber connected to a ball valve, then you should have the ballvalve connected to a spring loaded trigger. This will release air quicker.
Dart,
I'm not sure that I understand you correctly.
Are you talking about using an air cylinder to quickly open a ball valve?
I've not had any experience with fast acting ball valves, but I have had plenty of experience with manually operated ball valves that we intentionally opened slowly, to very slowly pressurize something.
They do provide full flow when fully open, while still letting you slowly open them to gradually get up to full pressure/flow. But even as fast as you can operate them, they still open fairly slowly compared to some other types.
For FAST actuation, we've used poppet valves, diaphragm valves, spool valves, etc. Many of them are all way too expensive for my hobby budget. A simple sprinkler valve is IN my budget.
Granted, my experience has been in an industrial environment, where opening valves SMOOTHLY, sometimes thousands of times a day, without any sudden action is of a prime concern.
I don't think that is the case with spud gun valves. Seems like they need to open VERY fast. Admittedly, I'm out of my element here, but I'm trying to learn.
Educate me, please.
Thanks,
Duane 8) 8)
Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 9:30 pm
by Technician1002
Educate you.. Ok Most ball valves on a good day opened by hand open fully in the 100mS or slower range. A good piston opens fully in under 10 mS.
Flow when open is a very important factor which is based on what the air has to go around when the valve is open. A ball valve exceeds the flow of any sprinkler valve when open due to the straight through design, but as mentioned above it has a serious speed trade off. Which is better? depends on the size of the cannon, barrel length and projectile weight. Ball valve for large heavy projectiles that launch relatively slowly, and sprinkler valve for shorter barrels with lighter projectiles.
A home made piston valve, can provide excellet flow at reasonable speed and are the valve of choice for serious air cannon builders.
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 8:06 am
by dewey-1
duane;
Have you considered using a 5 pound fire extinquisher as a chamber?
It is about 14.5 inches and 4 inch diameter.
http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/ ... revstart=0
A 3/4 inch QEV may actually be a better choice than a 1 inch sprinkler valve!
Welcome to the forum and by the way my name is Duane as well!
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:58 pm
by duane
Thanks for all of the encouragement and advise guys.
I've played with GGDT, last night with imaginary numbers, and this afternoon with some more realistic numbers that I was able to to track down. (I know they're not perfect numbers yet, but much better than I had guessed at last night)
I know that GGDT is not 100% accurate, but that's completely O.K. A computer model that's "only" 5-10% accurate beats the heck out of spending money and time experimenting.
It lets me change one variable at at time, and see the results, without spending a dime.
And it's totally busted some ideas that I thought that I "knew".
Thanks so much.
Duane
Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:07 pm
by duane
dewey-1 wrote:duane;
Have you considered using a 5 pound fire extinquisher as a chamber?
It is about 14.5 inches and 4 inch diameter.
http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/ ... revstart=0
A 3/4 inch QEV may actually be a better choice than a 1 inch sprinkler valve!
Welcome to the forum and by the way my name is Duane as well!
No, I haven't consider using a fire extinguisher bottle.
But it does give me some ideas.
Thanks for the welcome.
Duane
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:47 pm
by duane
With you guy's advice, and after playing with GGDT a while, I've came up with a design for my tennis ball mortar.
Unfortunately, I have not found a local source for many of the components that I'll need, so I've got them ordered.
I'm sure to have missed a couple things, that I can hopefully find locally, but the parts on order come to less than $100.
The whole project looks to be at about $125.
Not bad for a project that'll keep me busy for months. Cheap entertainment, huh? 8)
Duane
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:27 pm
by Gun Freak
What sort of design did you decide on?
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:32 pm
by duane
Gun Freak,
I don't have an image to share yet, so I'll just have to try describing it...
(now is the time for you to put on your IMAGINATION glasses)
It's a barrel over chamber setup, using 2 1/2" SHD 40 PVC for both the barrel and the chamber, along with a couple SHD 40 PVC 90 degree fittings, etc.
The main chamber will be 60" long, then 2 90 degree fittings, a reducer, then a 1" Orbit sprinkler valve, another reducer (enlarger), and then a 2 1/2" barrel, roughly 55" long. (what's left from a 5' stick, after cutting off a couple stubs, for the fittings).
For GGDT estimation purposes, I'm using 70" for the total chamber length, and 55" for barrel length.
I'll mount it on a wooden frame, at "about" 45 degrees. It's supposed to be a tennis ball MORTAR, remember?
8)
My plans are to use 75 PSI CO2 as a gas source. I'm sure that we'll play with the pressure, and the angle, once it's built.
Thanks,
Duane
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:39 pm
by Blitz
Dang, that's a long chamber for 2.5" diameter pipe. That's a pretty tall mortar.

Well, get started! You ought a be able to knock out that build in an hour or two, excluding.the mount.
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:20 pm
by duane
Blitz,
You're right. I'll model it again with GGDT before I build it. I've got 3-4 days before the Brown truck shows up.
Thanks,
Duane
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 6:49 pm
by Blitz
Yeah I'd see what effects shortening your chamber would have. That's an awfully large volume of air to fill up for what may be negligible results.
Also, don't forget that a tennis ball is inherently not a very effective projectile for distance, with the fuzzy covering and all. Its terminal velocity isnt too stellar so there's only so much you can do.
But I'll let someone who isn't dumb like I am have the final word.
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:34 pm
by duane
Blitz,
Just for fun, I scaled down the chamber length, and the barrel length by 50%. I had to increase the pressure by about 30% to get the same, or a little more muzzle velocity.
Hmmm.... I do want a Mortar, not a Howitzer.
I'll keep playing with the numbers.
Thanks for the inspiration.
Duane
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:45 pm
by Blitz
Did you try scaling down the chamber without changing.the barrel?

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:57 pm
by Gun Freak
Since you're working with a fixed amount of pipe, try getting the chamber as short as possible and barrel as long as possible. The barrel should, at the very least, be longer than the chamber, optimally a foot or two. Play with GGDT.