Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 3:06 am
I think an oxy-acetylene powered combustion gun would beat almost all pneumatics , but building a safe one would be next to impossible. And you'd need a license to store acetylene over here 
Pcguy Im coming over. we are having a go to lowes party. We are going to make a cannon. We are going to load me into it and send me to the moon. Because I am only 1 foot in diameter. Lol.PCGUY wrote:My Lowes carries up to 10" or 12", forgot which.
Mabe I am naturally skilled in neumatics but for me combustions are harder. I am pro at pneumatics. My "in progress" combustion is so......grr,Its pretty simple too. Mostly ignition problems.pimpmann22 wrote:I think what your trying to say is pnuematic or combustion. Seeing as you have already made one cannon you might want to make a pnuematic gun because they are harder to cnstruct and shoot farther. I have expressed my opinion about this before to and i think the only real thrill in a pnuematic is the construction process. Shooting combustions are so much funner to shot (I think). A big BOOM and a flame is some much cooler then a rush of air. If your wondering i have also built a pnuematic gun before and the only thrill was making it. I dont know if you should listen to my opinion seeing as it is a miniorty (who have the same opinion as me) and the rest of the spud gunners that arent in my minority they seem to like pnuematic. I hope i have given you good idea of what you want to do. Sorry for it being so long