Page 2 of 4
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:20 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Hmmmm makes sense but I still that a bit of extra travel would be beneficial....
Why?
or rather,
por que?
Beyond the magical caliber/4 figure, you are getting absolutely no extra advantage in flow - simply increasing pilot volume, and also expanding the size of the air reservoir which in turn lowers the pressure.
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:23 am
by Gepard
'Cos it saves the gas going right around and then in,
Chances are you can't get exactly d/4 and so it's best to err on the side of performance.
Only talking about an extra 5-10mm not lots....
Michael
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:07 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Gepard wrote:'Cos it saves the gas going right around and then in
Sorry for being such an efficiency nazi but I can't stand waste. In practical terms, a few mm won't make *that* much of a difference, but since air is a limited power source compared to solid propellants, it makes sense (for me at least) to want to extract every available ft/lb from a specific launcher.
No matter how much the piston moves back the air in a coaxial is still going to have to change direction to exit through the barrel, I don't see how it will improve performance to have the piston move back further.
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:09 am
by Gepard
We talking about a co-axial? I thought we were talking about piston valves in general......
Michael
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:14 am
by Modderxtrordanare
Gepard wrote:We talking about a co-axial? I thought we were talking about piston valves in general......
Michael
Does it matter? The air still has to turn around 180°.
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:18 am
by Gepard
I don't see the need to carry on this thread....
Where does it go round 180 degrees in a 'normal' piston?
Michael
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:21 am
by Modderxtrordanare
Gepard wrote:I don't see the need to carry on this thread....
Where does it go round 180 degrees in a 'normal' piston?
Michael
If you have an over under set up like the majority of the barrel sealing piston valves that have been made, the air goes through two 90° bends. It's not an immediate 180° turn. But some of the air, such as in the pilot area outside of the barrel, does have to make a 180.
Edit: I just noticed Jack's avatar being animated, maybe I'm just retarded though...

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:24 am
by Gepard
Ah - true, but I was refering to the flow of the gas from the chamber to the barrel through the piston.
Michael
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:08 pm
by dongfang
Hi jack.....
for 1/4 of the caliber of travel, you get an available area of 2*pi*r*h, in this case 2*3.142*0.5*0.25, which equals 0.7855 in 2
You have a hangover all right.
What's pi doing in the formula for the area of a rectangle? Your valve passage is really pi times smaller than the barrel cross section.
Gepard:
Where does the 90 come into it?
I must ask you that? You were the one who started with a 90 somewhere
I guess it is our valve seat diameter.
Regards
Soren
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:13 pm
by Gepard
No - he's right, he's talking about a co-axial where gap the piston leave is a cylinder.
You mentioned 90 in your post. I even quoted you!
Michael
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:58 pm
by dongfang
Ok, coaxial. Maybe I should read what they write
Hey, that is sure in favor of the coaxial in efficiency.
Soren
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:03 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
dongfang wrote:You have a hangover all right.
What's pi doing in the formula for the area of a rectangle? Your valve passage is really pi times smaller than the barrel cross section.
I'm the one who should be asking how the hell did you get a rectangle of flow into an area that is a cylinder ;p didn't drink *that* much y'know

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:05 am
by flamerz14

ARRGGHHH.

I hate maths.and i'm only 14. joo makes me miserable..so simple conclusion:
1.the smaller the pilot volume the better
2.light pistons are good
3.equilisation holes are for airtight pistons and should be <5mm
last one not complete... 1/4 or 3/4?
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:37 am
by Modderxtrordanare
flamerz14 wrote:1.the smaller the pilot volume the better
2.light pistons are good
3.equilisation holes are for airtight pistons and should be <5mm
Equalization holes should actually be just small enough as to have a smaller flow rate than that of your filling valve. (i.e. Schrader)
The 1/4 caliber = ideal piston travel distance is correct, as Jack both stated and proved. (Albeit with his nasty hang-over.)
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:05 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
(Albeit with his nasty hang-over.)
Feeling a lot better now, cheers

good to be back home and on my own PC, instead of having to share an internet cafe with drooling perverts browsing porn and death-mutes having animated webcam conversations that look like their trying to defend themselves from a particularly visciois swarm of wasps.
and flamerz, yeah, what Modder said
