Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:41 pm
yeah but they are not illegal and most likely they are already in placeExcept that water cannons don't force them to stop/disengage
Page 13 of 13
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:05 am
Apparently even marine biologists have gotten into the act 
Looks like an electrically actuated sprinkler valve, flow restrictions, dead space galore... uoi'd expect more from academics, dolphin huggers or not.
Still, spudguns and birthday yoga, I chose the wrong career
Looks like an electrically actuated sprinkler valve, flow restrictions, dead space galore... uoi'd expect more from academics, dolphin huggers or not.
Still, spudguns and birthday yoga, I chose the wrong career
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:53 am
See I think you all are wrong, this is a perfectly adequate cannon. If any of you own a boat, nets are sucked up super easily and can ruin your whole lower unit. I see some potential in this. All it needs to be perfect is motion activation and a somesort of autoloader(like a hopper)
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:51 am
no... this is not a good cannon. massive flow restrictinos, electric actuation, not a well constructed cannon
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:07 pm
VERY bad cannon. Huge dead space.
I think this is a sort of spare parts cannon. Just for fun.
And, I think you can have a lot of fun with it.
And, if I want to impress pirates, I would build a high mix hybrid Flak 88 with cartridges
I think this is a sort of spare parts cannon. Just for fun.
And, I think you can have a lot of fun with it.
And, if I want to impress pirates, I would build a high mix hybrid Flak 88 with cartridges
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:35 pm
I think he's referring to the cannon in the original post, after we pooh-poohed the idea of firing nets to ensare the propulsion system versus destroying the actual superstructureJDP12 wrote:no... this is not a good cannon. massive flow restrictinos, electric actuation, not a well constructed cannon