You will excuse me, I hope, if I won't take the word of someone who qualified in medicine as law when the discussion is about particle science and quantum physics.BC Pneumatics wrote:Personally I would say the number of people that have the qualifications to back up their doomsday predictions is closer to .84 than 0.
I have no doubt that he knows more than I do, but equally, I have equally little doubt that the genuine physicists at CERN know more than he does.
Put it this way - you take millions of times more risk of being killed when you get into a car than the LHC creating a black hole that's going to eat you, so what's the fuss?
PS: Do you mean "weary" (as in tired of) or "wary" (cautious of) in your last sentence? I wasn't 100% sure. (No, it really is a serious question, but I couldn't resist the joke.)