Not really, whether using a pop-off valve directly as a valve as I've done in experiments or as a pilot for QEV/piston valve as psycix did here you get a neat, compact setup without any circuitry running around, and you can vary power by altering the pressure at which the pop-off pops and rate of fire by varying the flow of air into the chamber/pilot, faster flow gives higher rate.ONEWING wrote:A purely pneumatic setup is of course a lot better though more difficult, bulky and harder to vary.
Magnetic Pulse Valve
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- POLAND_SPUD
- Captain

- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
so check this first
and then look here
they all seem pretty cheap... just make sure you buy the right one... (one that will automatically switch on -> off in a loop)
and then look here
they all seem pretty cheap... just make sure you buy the right one... (one that will automatically switch on -> off in a loop)
Children are the future
unless we stop them now
unless we stop them now
The valve as shown in first post was tried, it didn't work at all. The hold doesn't diminish quickly enough. The only other thing to try is using steel on magnet rather then magnet on magnet as its hold doesnt have as much range but I dont hold high hopes.
Its just going to open up a fraction until the area around the piston magnet for air to escape is the same as that exiting through the bolt. Was hoping the blast of air would push it right open before the chamber behind the valve had a chance to equalise but that isn't the case.
I dont think its a good idea anymore, not without over complexifying it.
Its just going to open up a fraction until the area around the piston magnet for air to escape is the same as that exiting through the bolt. Was hoping the blast of air would push it right open before the chamber behind the valve had a chance to equalise but that isn't the case.
I dont think its a good idea anymore, not without over complexifying it.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Welcome to my lifeONEWING wrote:I dont think its a good idea anymore, not without over complexifying it.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
You could still use the magnents, but assist the unit with a return spring. Since the magnenets have a nominal amount of force, you could use a smaller than usual diameter wire spring. The smaller spring will allow for a much easier fit as well.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 22 Replies
- 6001 Views
-
Last post by tomthebomb137
-
- 1 Replies
- 1023 Views
-
Last post by POLAND_SPUD
-
- 45 Replies
- 11276 Views
-
Last post by Carlman
-
- 3 Replies
- 2113 Views
-
Last post by jackssmirkingrevenge
-
- 39 Replies
- 9050 Views
-
Last post by joannaardway


