Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:02 pm
by djt
Haha good point, I mean why do we need to know how much damage a gun does to a person...i think there is some kind of evil plan going on here....
But actually it would be cool to compare the damage of different things. You dont really need something with the consistancy of flesh to compare shots.
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:07 pm
by Dom
If everyone on the forum would take this receipe, we should be able to easily compare power of ammo/guns.
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:06 pm
by abcdefg
seriously how strong is this stuff, i dont see it stopping a bullet from an actual gun, maybee some crap from a shotgun but thats it.
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:09 pm
by Dom
Obviously it's not gonna stop a bullet... it's like plain jello...
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:13 pm
by beebs111
it would still be cool to have something the consistenty as flesh, that way we can know the damage it would do to a person without actually shooting someone(duh)
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:18 pm
by abcdefg
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:32 pm
by MrCrowley
because its interesting.....a guy on the net proved that Dick Chaney did shoot a guy from a distance of around 30' not 10' as critics said. So it was most likely an accident.
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:32 am
by Dom
Then EXPERIMENT guys. Try different ratios.
Or go to the grocery store, at the meat departement, ask for an old steak
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:34 pm
by Dom
wtf u retard I said AN OLD STEAK.
One that turned out.
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:17 pm
by boilingleadbath
ABCs, I point at google and say "ballistics gelitin" + "round"
...because, yes, ballistics gellitin stops bullets faster than you might expect. (or maybe not... I dunno what you expect)
Also:
http://www.tacticalshotgun.ca/ballistics_rifle.html
http://www.brassfetcher.com
