Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:20 pm
by Dom
I'm sorry but it's just purely idiotic. The guy just wants to lose his job. The minute a student will be pist at him or be slightly injured, they will tell their parents :mommy a teacher at school shoots spuds at us... here goes its jobs... but I don't care if he doesn't care

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 4:30 pm
by LGM
I'm sure that the kids have been asked to notify their parents and someone like the principal knows what they are doing, and if a kid manages to hurt himself during this I really don't feel sorry for him.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:21 pm
by Dom
If a kid manages to hurt himself you don't feel sorry for him? Maybe you'll be sorry for the teacher?
And I highly doubt parents were notified their kids will catch potatoes shot from a potatogun.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:28 pm
by frankrede
Dom wrote:BC Pneumatics wrote:You right, if there is any possibility of injury, kids shouldn't do it. Quick, no more baseball, football, or even speed walking! The fact is that something like this is just as close to a Nerf gun as it is to a respectable firearm in muzzle energy. If kids can play with three molar hydrochloric acid in school, they can catch a f*cking potato.
There is a slight different between a sport and a potato gun. A potato gun is considered as a loaded firearm. One day a kid will be hurt, by a teacher like that, parents will complaint, and spudding will be illegal. Go ahead, give a bad image to our hobby.
Except a potato gun isn't a firearm dumbass. He isn't shooting at people he is shooting it in the air, and it probably loses most of its power as soon as it starts coming down, as soon as it starts to go down its no more different than throwing a potato and catching it.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:11 pm
by SpudBlaster15
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:30 pm
by Insomniac
I agree, shooting them up an catching them is perfectly safe (well no more dangerous then baseball) BUT there is a problem. A kid goes home and sais 'damn, I was hit by a baseball' the parents would think nothing of it. Put the word 'gun' in the sentance and people perceive it a lot differently. ie 'damn, the teacher was shooting a spudgun for us and I got hit'
The problem is that most people automatically react differently if certain words are involved. Words like 'gun, explosion, fire, explosive and firework'
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:15 am
by BC Pneumatics
Dom wrote:
There is a slight different between a sport and a potato gun. A potato gun is considered as a loaded firearm. One day a kid will be hurt, by a teacher like that, parents will complaint, and spudding will be illegal. Go ahead, give a bad image to our hobby.
Yes, there is a difference- potato launcher are safer. A potato gun is only considered a loaded firearm by your ignorant mind. If you really think this is true, then you don't give firearms near the respect they deserve. It is true that there is a potential for being hurt, but saying that this is a foolish or risky practice is the same as saying it would be idiotic for him to throw a baseball as hard as he could for some kids to catch 50 yards down range. this behavior is perfectly acceptable, and is in no way going to lead to a 'bad image' for the hobby. Don't act like a crusader of safety and responsibility- you're not.
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:17 am
by Dom
I respect your opinion... but I am really disappointed by it.
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:20 am
by BC Pneumatics
Dom, I have been doing this for longer than you- that is something I can almost guarantee- I would never do or condone anything that had potential for harming the 'image of the hobby' If dropping a couple grams of sodium into watter is an acceptable teaching stunt, then so is this.
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:04 pm
by iknowmy3tables
for crying out loud the gun is a baby 3 foot long combustion with a large enough barrel to shoot potatoes big enough to catch, the potatoes are loosing a lot of velocity, if he shot straight forward it probably would even reach the kids in midfield, I bet he has to aim the gun up to just to reach the kids, this is probably as safe if not safer than the teacher throwing baseballs