Page 4 of 12
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:01 pm
by Petitlu
soon the firing system

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:06 pm
by Gun Freak
I'm liking the stock
Much better. I still wouldn't want to have my face near it

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:08 pm
by POLAND_SPUD
As he said, a leak on the pilot side of a QEV, or an airtight projectile combined with a leak on the front seal of a QDV can also trigger the shot.
Seriously ?? a leak will just vent to the atmosphere... I don't think this can trigger it... the only question is >> wouldn't it be a better idea to add a piston that does what ammo does right now ? If there was a valve he could use and ammo that fits the barrel
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:13 pm
by Petitlu
"J'ai encore ne voudrais pas que mon visage près qu'elle "
the breech is screwed so it is good!
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:15 pm
by Gun Freak
Mais je ne voudrais pas que mon visage près que 600 psi
As long as you feel safe with the construction, go for it!

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:19 pm
by Petitlu
ok
I understand you
PAC with my high pressure 3000psi on my face!

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:20 pm
by al-xg
A leak will just vent to the atmosphere,
Not with an airtight projectile... or as was mistakenly stated an airtight bolt on this valveless design.
Not much pressure is needed to move the projectile forward.
I'm pretty sure this has happened before, may have been on one of the french QDV launchers though.
Hehe, but then it wouldn't be valveless

He uses the same projectiles in his other copper barrelled canons. and in fact aren't those the ones you were saying would be good simple affordable drag stabilised projectiles ?

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:30 pm
by Gun Freak
Petitlu wrote:PAC with my high pressure 3000psi on my face!

Je ne le ferai jamais

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:02 pm
by POLAND_SPUD
and in fact aren't those the ones you were saying would be good simple affordable drag stabilised projectiles ?
yup and I like them but I can't say I don't understand those who would like to be able to shoot just anything that fits in the barrel
Not with an airtight projectile... or as was mistakenly stated an airtight bolt on this valveless design.
Not much pressure is needed to move the projectile forward.
I still don't get it... air would have to leak out fast enough to create an area behind the projectile where pressure is > 10psi or so
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:05 pm
by Gun Freak
But if the projectile is airtight and the man's using 600 psi then it's not going to take long at all for 10 psi to collect behind the projectile.
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:57 am
by Petitlu
"
But if the projectile is airtight and the man's using 600 psi then it's not going to take long at all for 10 psi to collect behind the projectile."
not because behind the projectile is not sealed so the air to the atmosphere from
No pressure rise ...
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:25 am
by Gun Freak
Don't worry Petitlu, it doesn't apply here since your ammo is your valve.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:13 pm
by Brian the brain
But if the bolt leaks you will get some loss.
So...
How about this idea:
Use the firingpin as the safety.
In cocked position it should leak, when released it should be as airtight as possible.
You could do this by having it all fit REALLY snug to avoid unnessecary losses ...then file the portion that travels in the bolt down so when cocked there is an open airchannel.
This could be done without any other changes.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:23 pm
by Petitlu
sorry but I do not understand ...

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:38 pm
by Brian the brain
projectiles=good
launcher= very good!
For safety reasons with 100% seal : change the bolt.
Cut out a section, see picture.
Maybe ask Al-xg for translation.