Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:02 am
by OwThatsMyEye
SpudStuff wrote:he'll probably die.
Many have been built all have lived...
Please justify yourself. Sure it is quite dangerous but not id the saftey percautions are taken.
Yeah, and really whats the point in making somthing that isn't dangerous. That just takes all the fun out of it.
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:20 am
by Spyider
well thats 1/2 the fun in it isnt it and the other 1/2 is to show it off to your frinds... or on this site lolz
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:33 pm
by frankrede
I wouldn't use napalm.
It seems alot more dangerous.
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:18 pm
by Hotwired
A UK made 'external combustion cannon' using petrol and 20 bar co2.
http://www.uksgc.co.uk/forums/index.php ... c=175&st=0
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:06 am
by sgort87
Napalm is one of the most harmless "dangerous" things ever. It's basically sterno. It's a flammable goo. It's hard to light and really isn't all that impressive. It doesn't explode like many people assume.
It's only good if you plan on splashing it on someone once it's lit. The stuff stays in a hard but flexible state until lit and then it gets all gooey and stucks to whatever touches it.