Page 344 of 443
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:21 pm
by velocity3x
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:Even if you open a job to anyone, regardless of their personal attributes, and give it to the first person who turns up, you're still discriminating against the ones who turned up later or not at all. Whenever there are less opportunities than people, you will have to discriminate on one basis or another.
Regardless of race or gender, I applaud those who achieve their goals in spite of the hardships they might face, but have no time or tolerance for those who fail and claim it was "because I am _________ ".
I have no problem with discrimination in the job market. I start a business and bet everything I have, including my balls and future that my business will succeed. I really couldn't give a crap about public input about how my business should be run or whom I should hire (or fire) and why. It's my life I'm wagering. I assume ALL the risks and ALL the losses, while I guarantee the employees receive their paychecks. MANY times, after making payroll, their isn't enough left for me to buy Tortillas and Beans, yet the employees have been living well all along. When my payday FINALLY arrives, it's usually sizeable. If I go out treat myself to something (ski boat, motor home, etc.) The employees complain to each other that "I'm making it on their backs" and they become resentful. I'm sick of public thinking that when someone creates a business, it should be for the good of the community and his fellow man. Screw that! I create a business for the good of my family and me. If someone feels they are the object of discrimination, they are free to risk everything they have (and yet to have) and start their own business. I'm sick of todays work force sniveling, complaining and trying to control the business I sacrificed and struggled to create. Hell with public input in my business and to hell with lazy, envious employees that play the poor me "Discrimination Card"!
Just my 2ยข
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:32 pm
by ramses
If you really want to shut them up, post a graph of your biweekly paycheck somewhere in the work area. Not sure that's worth the loss of privacy to you, but it might gain you some respect.
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:36 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
velocity3x wrote:I really couldn't give a crap about public input about how my business should be run or whom I should hire (or fire) and why. It's my life I'm wagering. I assume ALL the risks and ALL the losses, while I guarantee the employees receive their paychecks.
Hear hear. I see nothing wrong with a business having a social policy and
contributing to the local community, but it should have no legal obligation to do so. When were people taught to be so friggin' entitled anyway, human rights - check, human responsibility - nah, cheers.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 12:59 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Only the Dutch would do this

what a shot!
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 11:14 pm
by jsefcik
Pressure question,,, with these heavy rains my family is going to be needed a second sump pump nd I got the idea to connect another sump pump to another pumps line,, the one pump is already connected to the one drain line, nd I was just going to put a tee with aball valve so I can keep it closed when rain isnt hard enough for two pumps,,,, my concern is if I connect two pumps to one pipe will it hurt the pumps or burst the pipe again two going into one?
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:32 am
by Gippeto
Check valve would be better than a ball valve as you won't need to open it manually. Adjust float switch on second pump to come on only if first pump is not keeping up.
Is the drain line sufficiently large to handle the flow from both pumps? If not, you effectively increase head pressure, and reduce the output of both pumps while working both pumps harder...ie increased current load. More amps for less benefit...lose/lose situation.
Best would be separate drain lines and float switches set as mentioned.
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:02 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Now that's a nailgun...
[youtube][/youtube]
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:52 am
by jsefcik
Ok thanks man ,,, I thought I was wrong but figured id ask
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:10 am
by mako
Dang, JSR. That thing makes us look pathetic, doesn't it? Talk about the mother of all nailguns. 250 mph? That's just scary.
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:35 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
mako wrote:Dang, JSR. That thing makes us look pathetic, doesn't it? Talk about the mother of all nailguns. 250 mph? That's just scary.
You bet. That's about 370 feet per second.
To put it into perspective, this is just 90 feet per second!
[youtube]
[/youtube]
damn...
On a completely different note, teenage girls *sigh*
[youtube]
[/youtube]
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:13 pm
by evanmcorleytv
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:
damn...
On a completely different note, teenage girls *sigh*
[youtube][/youtube]
Little do you know that we tell girls like that to kill themselves all the time

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:05 am
by jackssmirkingrevenge
evanmcorleytv wrote:Little do you know that we tell girls like that to kill themselves all the time

That's a bit extreme... one would think Darwin would take care of it sooner or later
Maybe they could play with this little device...
[youtube]
[/youtube]
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:02 pm
by POLAND_SPUD
yes we can brian

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:37 pm
by Brian the brain
Can we keep it decent?
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:10 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Brian the brain wrote:Can we keep it decent?
There is not enough soap in the world
