Page 5 of 8
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:22 am
by far_cry
gippeto
i know that air can go outside with thes high pressures from the littelest holes but liquids is not
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:51 am
by Gippeto
True enough, but I am missing your point.
Please, feel free to expand on your comment.

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 12:26 pm
by far_cry
i mean if you can get 6000 psi hpa in this monster you make . will be some leaks ?
sorry for my bad english i am from israel
and did you see my pump that i maked ? thanks to you sure
and you will love the replacement of the O ring thing
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtop ... tml#206181
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:29 pm
by Gippeto
To be totally honest, as I have not tested it past 1000psi with a gas of any sort, ... I don't know. It should not leak.
The design uses quad rings to seal the larger pieces, and now uses a teflon seal on the valve stem.
With increasing pressures, the seals actually "seal better".
I do KNOW that my new valve stem and the quad rings do not leak at 850psi. (room temp CO2)
The highest pressurized air that is available to me currently is 4500psi. I have yet to purchase a tank though.
Otherwise, I can get nitrogen at up to 6000psi locally. A really nice alternative as it will actually increase performance without increasing pressure.
These options WILL require a regulator, as I have no intention of using more than the 3000psi originally planned for.
Helium is also being considered.
Your english is not a problem.
I will suggest that you expand on your comments so that people get a better idea of what you are trying to say.
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:30 pm
by DYI
These options WILL require a regulator, as I have no intention of using more than the 3000psi originally planned for.
Helium is also being considered.
No, they WILL require a way to reduce the pressure. Do you have any idea how ludicrously expensive a regulator that could output 3kpsi
anything would be? I'd suggest an adaptor and needle valve, you could probably cut costs by at least 75%, maybe more, compared to a reg.
Helium would certainly cause an improvement in performance, but would you have enough pressure to make it worthwhile? I suppose that with lighter saboted rounds, it'd make all the difference.
Best of luck with this, I hope that it doesn't develop any leaks at higher pressure (although I can almost guarantee that it will leak to some appreciable extent with helium).
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:17 pm
by Gippeto
I do not believe that shot to shot consistency can be achieved with a needle valve set up. This will be necessary for accuracy.
I will need a regulator.
As you mention, the cost of such a device would be "ludicrous".
Unless I build it myself.

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:00 am
by far_cry
4500 psi hpa
where you can get high pressure like this ?? air compressor thate fill diving bottle
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:59 pm
by Gippeto
Yes.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:39 pm
by dilweed
Congradulations, You are now a spudfile equivalent to a celebrity! All bow down to the allmighty Gippeto!
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:53 pm
by Gippeto
I rather doubt that.
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 2:24 pm
by dilweed
dilweed wrote:Congradulations, You are now a spudfile equivalent to a celebrity! All bow down to the allmighty Gippeto!
It was a compliment! Your gun is awesome, but i'd make only one change. MAKE A WOODEN STOCK. It would look amzing. Carve, it dye, it, and you will have not only a really powerfull launcher, but also a beautifull piece of art. Dam, im so jealous. I relly wish I had the tools to make something like that. Sigh-
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 7:54 am
by far_cry
hi gippeto
how are you
fainly you finish the project
time to see some action
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:03 pm
by Gippeto
It shouldn't be too long now.

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:06 pm
by ALIHISGREAT
Gippeto wrote:It shouldn't be too long now.

any teaser pics? i've been waiting to see this beast completed for
ages 
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:09 pm
by mark.f
I too, demand teasers.
Do not enanger me.