Page 6 of 7

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:14 pm
by Velocity
1" should work for full porting... though, I would make it 1.5" or 2", just to be safe. It will not decrease performance any discernable amount (at least it didn't on mine)

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:05 pm
by PVC Arsenal 17
Now you and I both have female adapters with plugs as the back end. Should I count the threads inside as part of the travel?

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:54 pm
by Velocity
If it is SCH 80 and you are using the 3" fittings as we discussed, then no. A suggestion: fill in the 4" plug except for the 3/4" (it is 3/4", right?) port hole with some kind of filler. Maybe epoxy, or maybe foam rubber (to fill in the space and provide part of a bumper; it would not suffice fully unless you extended it out of the 4" plug (which I recommend). With a pilot volume so large, you are going to want to reduce the pilot volume for faster actuation.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 10:29 am
by PVC Arsenal 17
I am considering filling the plug. What I meant to say was there are still female threads on the inside, because the plug doesn't screw in all the way. Should I count the length of these female threads as part of the piston travel? Sorry, I was half asleep writing that and half asleep still so forgive me if I don't make understand or make any sense.


I've checked and the piston stops at the plug so that's no problem.

Another thing I'm considering is to extend the piston with a coupling so that I can end the barrel portion halfway in the tee. That way I don't have the restriction squeaks mentioned.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:52 pm
by schmanman
good! cant wait to see this finished!

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:17 pm
by Bluetooth
YAY!!!! It started again!!!!!!
EDIT: YAAAAAAAY!!!! I can't wait until you might have one of the most powerful guns.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:15 pm
by zeigs spud
wow kool! heres my only sugestion. it would keep the ammo in place as well as makeing reloading quciker,easyer, and cooler looking lol.

:mrgreen:
Image

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:55 pm
by MrCrowley
I acutally like the way hes done it in his first animation, Its pretty nifty looking and way better then pissing around with a bolt.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:19 pm
by judgment_arms
I mean no offence zeigs spud, but I like his idea PVC Arsenal 17’s idea better…don’t know why just do, you idea’s not bad either, I just like his better.
PVC Arsenal 17, how long till it’s done? I’m gettin' mighty impatient, I want to see this thing put a spud through a brick wall.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:04 pm
by PVC Arsenal 17
Starting to work soon. I have to have my garage cleaned to make room for everything. Maybe by next if I do nothing else.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:08 pm
by pyromanic13
zeigs spud wrote:wow kool! heres my only sugestion. it would keep the ammo in place as well as makeing reloading quciker,easyer, and cooler looking lol.

:mrgreen:
Image
he's trying to squeaze the most performance he can out of his gun...Ithink his way is more efficient

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:38 pm
by PVC Arsenal 17
Yes, I was going to try a bolt style breech but due to cost/complexity I didn't. I chose this idea over other because it leaks very little, if at all. I want full performance.

Man I really hope this thing lives up to the hype....

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:01 pm
by squeaks
I think you should invest some money into some cam locks. It's only about another $16. Full performance, quick reload, small price add on.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:15 pm
by PVC Arsenal 17
Eventually I will. And also a 2 1/2" barrel for tennis balls. If my parents buy a house on this lake my goal is to get tennis balls across it. It's 1,200 feet.

Rmich, if you're reading, look a few posts up. I asked another ? about piston travel.

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:44 pm
by schmanman
ahhh, no cam locks. the breech design (along with clean construction) are going to be the factors that set this gun apart. don't use cam locks. :wink: :D