If I wanted to hold back a supply of air until the source reached a set psi (say 100) I could use a simple safety relief type setup, and vent the air into a pipe fitting. But once the valve cracks, and pressure builds up downstream, the valve needs to stay open until the source drops below 100psi again. Unfortunately, back pressure would close this type of valve as soon as enough pressure is built up downstream, helped by the spring pressure that held the initial pressure back.
This I think operates similar to a check valve that has a high cracking pressure, which is opposite check valve operating design since most check valves tout <1psi cracking pressure.
My feeder system needs a dwell to give the longer rounds time to get into the breech. It operates too fast for it's own good with the exhaust valve at the base of the piston. By delaying the piston from getting fed air, I figured a pressure based delay would be the best way to insure timing.
Any thoughts on this? I have not had any luck with finding any off the shelf parts for this pneumatic logic.
Check Valve interrupter confusion
I think the following diagram does the thing you want.
It only lets air through if the pressure exceeds a certain pressure (adjustable with spring force), independent of the current output pressure.
With a bit of imagination you could build this into a T-piece.
However, if you can you should use a flow restriction to make the delay. Simply use a needle valve to limit the flow of air going in, its cheap and easy.
It only lets air through if the pressure exceeds a certain pressure (adjustable with spring force), independent of the current output pressure.
With a bit of imagination you could build this into a T-piece.
However, if you can you should use a flow restriction to make the delay. Simply use a needle valve to limit the flow of air going in, its cheap and easy.
- Attachments
-
- Not to scale.
- check valve interruptor.PNG (2.86 KiB) Viewed 1904 times
Have you considered a needle valve? It doesn't do exactly what you describe but it would slow the flow to the piston.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General

- Posts: 26219
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 581 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
This valve is based on a similar system to what psycix illustrated, wouldn't that do the job?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- POLAND_SPUD
- Captain

- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
if all you need is an adjustable delay then you might try the design mentioned in my last thread here -> http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtop ... tml#268107I need to completely stop air from getting to the piston so it dwells for a brief instant
it's not exactly what you are looking for but one of its part does what you need
there are off the shelf parts that do that... in fact, they are quite commonly used in pneumatics
you can find them in clippard catalogue -> http://www.clippard.eu/fileadmin/user_u ... _72dpi.pdf
(Delay Valves, pp. 263-265)
but as I said eariler they are quite common so other manufacturers have them as well... clicky (this might be more straight forward / easier to understand)
Last edited by POLAND_SPUD on Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Children are the future
unless we stop them now
unless we stop them now
The difference with "my valve" and JSR's valve, is that when his valve closes and the pressure on the output drops, it seals on the porting and the effective surface area reduces.
Which is why "my design" doesn't feature a sealing face.
Though it could be useful to have it pulse open quickly. It would require only one o-ring, but on the other side JSR's valve only works properly if the output side drops to zero pressure. The keep-open pressure is way lower then the pop-open pressure.
See for yourself what suits your needs the best way, and don't forget to keep us updated.
Which is why "my design" doesn't feature a sealing face.
Though it could be useful to have it pulse open quickly. It would require only one o-ring, but on the other side JSR's valve only works properly if the output side drops to zero pressure. The keep-open pressure is way lower then the pop-open pressure.
See for yourself what suits your needs the best way, and don't forget to keep us updated.
- POLAND_SPUD
- Captain

- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
I am just curious... have you found the part you need ??
I've just got a delay valve (I want to build an oscillating circuit with it) and I think it's exactly what you need...
ohh and if you are looking for a more compact valve you might want to buy clippard's PV-1P (clippard catalogue p. 165)
I've just got a delay valve (I want to build an oscillating circuit with it) and I think it's exactly what you need...
ohh and if you are looking for a more compact valve you might want to buy clippard's PV-1P (clippard catalogue p. 165)
Children are the future
unless we stop them now
unless we stop them now
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 18 Replies
- 4229 Views
-
Last post by Hubb
-
- 4 Replies
- 2773 Views
-
Last post by Technician1002
-
- 8 Replies
- 3941 Views
-
Last post by psycix
-
- 6 Replies
- 1012 Views
-
Last post by inonickname
-
- 13 Replies
- 4061 Views
-
Last post by noname





