Flamethrower Pressurization

Meaningful discussion outside of the potato gun realm. Projects, theories, current events.
User avatar
Atlantis
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 955
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:26 pm
Location: Florida

I don't plan on building a flamethrower, but I was just wondering if this idea could work. Since it's not safe to use Oxygen in the chamber directly, could you have a piston between the air and the fuel, the air would push the piston and compress the fuel, that way Oxygen would not be able to mix with the fuel. I'm not sure if the fuel would spontaneously combust, because it's physical pressure instead of fluid pressure.
"There isn't a problem in the world that can't be solved by the proper application of explosives"
User avatar
drac
Corporal 4
Corporal 4
United States of America
Posts: 899
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:56 am
Location: Avon, NY
Been thanked: 2 times

The fuel wouldn't combust, because there's no oxygen. That would work, but you need a good seal on the piston.
User avatar
BC Pneumatics
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 1053
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Fresno, CA
Contact:

My favorite system for a flamethrower is diesel pressureized with propane.

(I have built 3 like this, all function well.)
User avatar
saladtossser
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 10:40 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

BC Pneumatics wrote:My favorite system for a flamethrower is diesel pressureized with propane.

(I have built 3 like this, all function well.)
i was just thinking, if CO2 was used, would it effect the fire since it's not pure fuel coming out?
"whoa... I thought pimpmann was black..."-pyromanic13
cannon freak
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 272
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:37 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

I don't know a whole lot about flame throwers but I don't think it would effect it at all unless you were lighting the fuel just as it comes out the barrel, which you probably are then it would put out the flame. If you were shooting at something that is already lit than the CO2 would have enough time to diffuse and not effect the fire.
User avatar
Mihlrad
Specialist 4
Specialist 4
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:45 pm

Depends how much co2, co2 is used for extinguishing fires, so if theres enough then it wont ignite the fuel.
(\__/)
(O.o)
(> <)
This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.

www.Jerichofd.com
www.Hobbytimeny.com
User avatar
spudmonkey
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:59 pm

i think the second it gets out of the chamber there will be enough to ignite at least the outer portion of the flame, it might give you better distance if the inner part of the flame doesnt ignite almost instantly
User avatar
carlbelcher
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 532
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:54 pm

Theoritically the co2 would be forcing the fuel out of the tanks. The co2 would stay in the tanks until all the fuel was forced out. There for the stream of fuel wouldn't contain any co2 until the very last drops of fuel.

Which I don't think you would want to ignite anyway, because if you have ever shot a super soaker you know the last few drops come out in a fine mist, which would make for a pretty nasty fire ball right in your face.
Is your Google.com Broken?!
User avatar
Atlantis
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 955
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:26 pm
Location: Florida

Cool, sounds like ym idea would work, you would just need a few O-Rings on the piston. For simplicity's sake, just use a spring to push the piston, you could remove most of the frame from a caulk gun and add a spring to the rod.
"There isn't a problem in the world that can't be solved by the proper application of explosives"
User avatar
drac
Corporal 4
Corporal 4
United States of America
Posts: 899
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:56 am
Location: Avon, NY
Been thanked: 2 times

CO2 is less dense than the fuel, so it will float to the top and all fuel will be expended before the CO2 starts coming out.
cannon freak
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 272
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 8:37 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

You could simple put a piston in between the fuel and CO2 that should work.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • First Build: Questions on Pressurization
    by Suedo » » in Pneumatic Cannons
    5 Replies
    3670 Views
    Last post by 1nxtmonster
  • Flamethrower help.
    by mik3v » » in Off-Topic Hobbies
    16 Replies
    7939 Views
    Last post by pizlo
  • Flamethrower!
    by Spyider » » in General Cannon Discussion
    49 Replies
    12603 Views
    Last post by sgort87
  • Flamethrower!
    by huse_spud » » in Off-Topic Hobbies
    31 Replies
    11720 Views
    Last post by singularity
  • Exhaust Flamethrower
    by Urban Ninja » » in Off-Topic Hobbies
    5 Replies
    1989 Views
    Last post by sergeantspud2