Page 1 of 1
Remote for co-axial
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:09 am
by flamerz14
How can I extend the exhaulst valve of the canon using a length of hose frm the end to a ball valve near the middle?
Parts:
1.co-axial gun
2.hose
3.ball valve
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:12 am
by VH_man
just like that.............
if youre talking about moving 100 feet away and then firing it, i reccomend using a non-pneumaticaly modified sprinkler valve, and actuating it with some REALLY long wires and lots of batteries.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:30 am
by spudthug
when u put the hose on remember that the longer the hose the slower ur valve will open... so keep that in consideration...
what size chamber/piston do u plan on using? it is hard to actuate it with a small ball valve if it isnt built well...
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:07 am
by noname
I have used this setup with about 5 coaxial diaphragm guns and it has worked every time. Of course, diaphragms are much easier to exhaust than pistons, so a piston may require a sprinkler valve, then the ball valve piloting the sprinkler.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:32 am
by hi
why dont you just tie a string to a ball valve?
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:16 am
by mega_swordman
That's all she wrote. That setup will do just fine, but as spudthug said it will slow down with longer tube. I am wondering however how far back do you want to be when you fire it? Depending on the length, I would either use an electric powered sprinkler valve, or as hi suggested, string. However, if you want it like your diagram, then the setup you have now will be just fine.
Hey guys, I'm back from a trip to Scotland.
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:10 pm
by spudthug
he just wants it to hold better...not really remotely i think..but im not sure.. so the hose can make it more like a real gun..
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:40 am
by flamerz14
spudthug's right.I'm planning to use it like about...halfway down the cannon.btw whats the difference between a diagphram and a piston?