New type of silencer

A place for general potato gun questions and discussion.
User avatar
benstern
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:24 pm

clide wrote:
benstern wrote:Well then i would prefer a shrouded barrel. IE: a barrel witrh some holes in it inside a larger pipe. Then you don't need to increase barrel length and thus sacrifice performance.
Increasing the barrel length won't sacrifice performance...cutting holes in the barrel would.
Increasing it beyond the optimum length as most people do would wreak havoc on performance due to friction.
User avatar
Lentamentalisk
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1202
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Berkeley C.A.

cant we just all agree that the idea doesnt work, so we call it a dead topic, and start a new one if we are going to argue about a shrouded barrel (or just go discuss it on a thread that is already about that, rather than kicking up this thread that has nothing to do with it?

commence ignoring of this thread.
clide
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Been thanked: 1 time

benstern wrote: Increasing it beyond the optimum length as most people do would wreak havoc on performance due to friction.
Right, but you shouldn't need to go beyond optimum, just right to optimum.
User avatar
benstern
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:24 pm

clide wrote: Right, but you shouldn't need to go beyond optimum, just right to optimum.
But as of yet we have no tools or equations to determine what that optimum point is. Thus most people do beyond it considerably.
clide
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Been thanked: 1 time

benstern wrote: But as of yet we have no tools or equations to determine what that optimum point is. Thus most people do beyond it considerably.
GGDT...
User avatar
benstern
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:24 pm

GGDT does not take into account silencers. There is not really an "add more volume to barrel than the barrel physically contains" input field.
clide
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Been thanked: 1 time

We must be talking about different things. I was talking about increasing the barrel length AS a silencer (the idea presented in original post), not increasing the barrel length with a silencer.
User avatar
psycix
Sergeant Major 4
Sergeant Major 4
Posts: 3684
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:12 am
Location: The Netherlands

clide wrote:
benstern wrote: Increasing it beyond the optimum length as most people do would wreak havoc on performance due to friction.
Right, but you shouldn't need to go beyond optimum, just right to optimum.
When you go beyond the optimum performance crashes quickly.
Also, when sucking vacuum you may get a bang, but then in reverse. So instead of highpressure in the barrel blasting out to the environment, the environment air smacks into the barrel, a balloon popping in reverse..?
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • silencer
    by Mini Khan » » in General Cannon Discussion
    9 Replies
    3789 Views
    Last post by brumby
  • silencer?
    by regre7 » » in General Cannon Discussion
    6 Replies
    3405 Views
    Last post by boilingleadbath
  • Silencer
    by Ballad_Black » » in General Cannon Discussion
    9 Replies
    4034 Views
    Last post by PCGUY
  • Silencer help.
    by warhead052 » » in BB, Airsoft, and Pellet Guns
    6 Replies
    1588 Views
    Last post by warhead052
  • Silencer?
    by No.Va » » in General Cannon Discussion
    7 Replies
    5035 Views
    Last post by CS