construction materials

Because potatoes only last one shot!
roygaddis
Recruit
Recruit
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:51 am

Not that anyone asked,but in my humble opinion the best expansion chamber is made from a large,(say 20 lb) fire extinguisher tank.The best barrel is made from a piece of 1" copper pipe about 4' long.The best propellant is oxygen and butane,and the best projectile is the bottom end of a ski pole wrapped with cord and topped with shrink tube.You won't blow it up,the smaller barrel concentrates more force,the propellant burns completely and the projectile will penetrate just about anything.Even rock.I've fired through both car doors and into a 55 gallon drum on half a balloonful of oxygen and two tiny shots of butane.C batteries work pretty good,too.Or you can use a 11/4" barrel and use those cheap,driving range golf balls -with the shell taken off- as projectilesThey will bounce back after going through a cinderblock and two bricks,though,so shoot from behind protective cover.
brogdenlaxmiddie
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 562
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 2:19 pm

Why exactly was this needed or helpful?


BTW- Welcome to the forum 8)
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26219
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Nothing better than a few photos and/or videos to back up your humble opinion and lend more weight to your argument ;)
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
MrCrowley
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 10078
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Been thanked: 3 times

Ah thanks for that... You have a lot to experiment with, try pneumatics.
Then your humble opinion might change :wink:
User avatar
Eddbot
Specialist 4
Specialist 4
Posts: 434
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:08 pm

Wait...i don't get it. What does this accomplish? Oh, and what ^ said, yeah...
:edfirst:
User avatar
Carlman
Staff Sergeant 2
Staff Sergeant 2
Posts: 1618
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:18 am
Location: Western Australia
Been thanked: 2 times

Eddbot wrote:Wait...i don't get it. What does this accomplish?
thats the point eddbot
Image
Aussie spudders unite!!
User avatar
DYI
First Sergeant 5
First Sergeant 5
Antigua & Barbuda
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Here and there

You have much to learn, young grasshopper :wink:

Welcome to the forum. If you have this launcher of yours, post it in whichever showcase is appropriate.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
SpudBlaster15
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Seychelles
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:12 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Last edited by SpudBlaster15 on Wed Jul 14, 2021 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jr
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:24 pm
Location: brem. wa.
Contact:

Yes the 20# fire extingisher is the correct chamber but I use mine to build a pneumatic....it is allmost finished. I am going to epoxy the fitting to the chamber just for good measure.

have it posted in a day or so..
User avatar
DYI
First Sergeant 5
First Sergeant 5
Antigua & Barbuda
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Here and there

While we're on that topic, O<sub>2</sub>/MAPP is better than O<sub>2</sub>/C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub>, ski poles aren't very good ammo at all, and I really doubt that such a small launcher running on atmospheric pressure O<sub>2</sub>/C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>10</sub> could put a projectile like a golfball through a cinderblock and 2 bricks without some very odd circumstances in play.

Once again, seeing is quite a bit closer to believing than is reading, so we want videos, or at least pictures.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26219
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 347 times

SpudBlaster15 wrote:Sorry for being the Physics Nazi, but that is a misconception too many people seem to have.
The're probably thinking of firearms, this is the general idea behind the taper or squeeze bore gun as used by the Germans in their sPzB 41 anti-tank gun.

Image
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Ragnarok
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5401
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:23 am
Location: The UK

jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:They're probably thinking of firearms
No, a lot of people I know have thought the same thing, and they're hardly firearms savvy.

People just imagine that force from pressure can just be concentrated down, thinking that the imaginary "lines of force" will the air flow path - which isn't the case.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
User avatar
Jared Haehnel
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: White River Jct, Vermont

You need more details... Is it pure O2 and butane? Is it at atmoshperic pressure or is it a pressurized? Do you have pictures? Can you take pictures...


Honestly I just can't see a golf ball going through concret bricks, the out side shell is the hardest part of the ball..if you remove that you just have giant boucy ball...

And Ragnarok is right... the pressure isn't concetrated just becuase the object is smaller... the only advantage you have over using a small barrel is you generaly have lighter ammo and greater vilocitiescompared to a larger bore... but that doesn't include sabots
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26219
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Jared Haehnel wrote:Honestly I just can't see a golf ball going through concrete bricks
I can :D
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Jared Haehnel
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:15 pm
Location: White River Jct, Vermont

Jared Haehnel wrote:
Honestly I just can't see a golf ball going through concrete bricks


I can
I ment with the design he had presented...the velocity would not likely be high enough...
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post