Here are the drawings for my new Semi-Auto BB gun prototype:
The yellow lines are threaded rods to attach the two rubber stoppers shown with blue fill lines. Green is a spring and red is a aluminum tubing. Air source comes in from the right side through blow gun. The workings should be self explanatory from there. Let me know what u guys think.
The hardest part of building such a design is to find pipes which fit in eachother.
On top of that O-rings may be applied.
If you can machine stuff, it all gets easier.
Till the day I'm dieing, I'll keep them spuddies flying, 'cause I can!
It seems as if designing a blow forward automatic is a right of passage here. Everyone and their grandma has done it. But, almost no-one has actually built their design, and I can't blame them.... Their hard as hell to build, and we would probably give a Nobel prize to the first guy to design one that's easy for anyone to build and make work well, which is unlikely, since the thing has moving parts and sealing faces. I feel that my own design has come closest to that benchmark, with the face of the piston simply being a piece of pipe with one end epoxied shut, and the sealing surface is the SIDE of the piston. Also, if it's out of sync, a roller switch can be adjusted either back or forward to adjust the opening and closing position of the pilot and filling valves, and is the first one I know of to use electronics to interrupt the flow of air.
Yeah I think that might be the only difficult part, it might take some trial and error and fine tuning but once i get the right spring tension it should work perfectly.
Below is the design I fiddle with, made from a 1/4" brass compression T. I never could get the spring tension quite right and it generally fired two BBs/trigger pull. There are two designs in the image below, the one on the left is the one I made. All the parts (except the spring) for the selector are from the compression fitting. The piston/selector itself is just the tube insert, that came with the fitting, installed backwards. The magnet is to keep the copper/steel 0.177" BBs from rolling out of the barrel. The tube insert is copper so it isn't affected by the magnet. For a valve I used a ~3/8" water control solenoid valve from a washing machine. The barrel was 3' of 1/4" brakeline.
Those are both good designs, and using a brass compression T is a good idea, very compact and helps to use off the shelf parts. Have you ever made a prototype of the design on the right? I'm curious to how well the return magnet idea works. It sounds like an interesting concept and I happen to have some powerful magnets so i might give that design a try, thanks.
knappengineering wrote:Those are both good designs, and using a brass compression T is a good idea, very compact and helps to use off the shelf parts. Have you ever made a prototype of the design on the right? I'm curious to how well the return magnet idea works. It sounds like an interesting concept and I happen to have some powerful magnets so i might give that design a try, thanks.
Nope, never made the design on the right. I would think there might be a somewhat tricky balance between the ID and the OD of the tube. If the wall of the tube is too thin there might not be enough force from the air flow to overcome the magnet and the mass of the tube. Too thick of a wall will unnecisarily restrict flow.
You also have to drill out the T to get the metal tube to fit.
Hi, Ive had this design, in my head for at least a year now, and Ive finally found the parts I need for it. I would be very grateful for any comments...
Last post
Have you thought about how the seals will hold up over time, or if any adjustments will be needed to handle wear and tear?