I don't see how a CLGG would be illegal if somebody had the facilities to make one worthwhile...warhead052 wrote:A light gas gun can probably go the furthest, but it is probably the most illegal of all the cannons. So I would stick with hybrid or pneumatic.
What type of cannon launches objects the farthest?
- mark.f
- Sergeant Major 4
- Posts: 3638
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: The Big Steezy
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 61 times
- Contact:
- Daltonultra
- Specialist 3
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:17 pm
- Location: Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
That's the world record for shooting a PUMPKIN, in competition, with a relatively low air pressure and a very slow valve. Even that cannon is capable of easily several times that range using something denser and more aerodynamic than a pumpkin. They're throttling back their power a LOT just to keep the pumpkin from exploding upon exit from the barrel.evanmcorleytv wrote:Are you two mental? The longest shot from ANY homemade cannon was pneumatic, but it was only 4800 feet, and it was in Punkin chunkin. And Warhead 6 miles? NO! 6 miles is over 31,000 feet! WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? lol AND Gun freak, He wants raw power, please don't dilute him with your backwards, one-sided pneumatic beliefs! (even though I prefer pneumatic also.. lol) Not flaming you guys, just stating facts.Gun Freak wrote:So can a pneumatica hybrid can reach up to 6 miles
There was supposedly an experimental warship in the late 1800s that used air compressed by a steam engine to fire shells several miles. I can't remember whether it was British or American, but the name was something like Volcanic.
The Official High-Tech Redneck
"There is no such thing as overkill." ~Solomon Short
"There is no such thing as overkill." ~Solomon Short
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1769
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:41 pm
Think about it, an explosive driven cannon? I think that the state would have a problem with that, unless you were licensed to do that sort of stuff.mark.f wrote:I don't see how a CLGG would be illegal if somebody had the facilities to make one worthwhile...warhead052 wrote:A light gas gun can probably go the furthest, but it is probably the most illegal of all the cannons. So I would stick with hybrid or pneumatic.
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
What's the difference between that and a hybrid except the gases? Combustions and hybrids are 'explosive' driven cannons.warhead052 wrote:Think about it, an explosive driven cannon? I think that the state would have a problem with that, unless you were licensed to do that sort of stuff.
Edit: I was talking about CLGGs not LGGs as I read that from Mark's post instead of reading Warhead's.
Last edited by MrCrowley on Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- mobile chernobyl
- Corporal 3
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:53 am
- Been thanked: 7 times
A CLGG and LGG are two different beasts...mark.f wrote:I don't see how a CLGG would be illegal if somebody had the facilities to make one worthwhile...warhead052 wrote:A light gas gun can probably go the furthest, but it is probably the most illegal of all the cannons. So I would stick with hybrid or pneumatic.
Have fun constructing a LGG with elevation control though lol - constructing one on perfectly flat ground is hard enough!
I'd have to put my money on EM accelerators having the most potential for "long distance"... no sound speed limitations.
EM accelerators have their own troubles. Even induction coil guns will run into troubles with melting their projectiles as launch speeds climb. Single use, multi-stage LGGs can likely be made to exceed 20km/s, but doing so would be so outlandishly expensive that I doubt it would ever be attempted.
Also, warhead... You do realize that hunting rifles are "explosive driven cannons", right? And that they're practically unregulated in the US so long as they're under 0.5" bore? There have been HE driven LGG designs, but apart from accelerating flyer plates or gas jets, they don't see any use, and are considerably less practical than the standard LE-powered type.
Conventional 2-stage LGGs use essentially the same propellants and would be quite expensive to construct in bores over 0.5", so I can't see where this argument is coming from. As to all other countries - it's all illegal, and your typical garden-variety judge or prosecutor couldn't tell an LGG from a spray'n'pray if his life depended on it.
Also, warhead... You do realize that hunting rifles are "explosive driven cannons", right? And that they're practically unregulated in the US so long as they're under 0.5" bore? There have been HE driven LGG designs, but apart from accelerating flyer plates or gas jets, they don't see any use, and are considerably less practical than the standard LE-powered type.
Conventional 2-stage LGGs use essentially the same propellants and would be quite expensive to construct in bores over 0.5", so I can't see where this argument is coming from. As to all other countries - it's all illegal, and your typical garden-variety judge or prosecutor couldn't tell an LGG from a spray'n'pray if his life depended on it.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1769
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:41 pm
DYI, by explosive I meant C4. Last I checked you can't use that legally any where, except maybe Somalia.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26216
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
*cough*Daltonultra wrote:There was supposedly an experimental warship in the late 1800s that used air compressed by a steam engine to fire shells several miles. I can't remember whether it was British or American, but the name was something like Volcanic.
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:These pneumatics, while granted aren't exactly home-made, could range out to 15,000 feet.

Almost got the name right, it was a specific volcano




hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Warhead, as far as I know, LGGs don't use detonating materials to drive the piston, they just use conventional smokeless powder.warhead052 wrote:DYI, by explosive I meant C4. Last I checked you can't use that legally any where, except maybe Somalia.
However, Voitenko Compressors do use high explosives to drive the pusher plate.
/sarcasm, /hyperbole
- Daltonultra
- Specialist 3
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:17 pm
- Location: Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Thank you, JSR! I spent hours searching for that stupid ship that night and couldn't get a single return!
The Official High-Tech Redneck
"There is no such thing as overkill." ~Solomon Short
"There is no such thing as overkill." ~Solomon Short
Warhead... Did you even read past the first sentence of my response?
To paraphrase it to better suit your attention span: What the hell would C4 be doing in an LGG? They use essentially the same propellants as conventional firearms.

To paraphrase it to better suit your attention span: What the hell would C4 be doing in an LGG? They use essentially the same propellants as conventional firearms.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1769
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:41 pm
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1769
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:41 pm
Yeah, uses PLASTIC explosives.... Or C4. This argument is getting no where, I'm out.