EVBEC stands for Energy & Volume Based Estimator for Combustions.
It is based on <a href="www.burntlatke.com">latke's</a> chamber:barrel test data.
As of Jan 7th, 2007, it can be used to model hybrids too.
We have a <a href="http://www.spudfiles.com/spud_wiki/inde ... pudwiki</a> artical on it, and I've written a pretty detailed use guide that can be veiwed <a href="http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtop ... &">here</a>.
EVBEC, a combustion "simulation" spreadsheet
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
- Attachments
-
EVBECv1.6.zip- EVBEC V1.6, and help file
- (20.14 KiB) Downloaded 765 times
Last edited by boilingleadbath on Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:41 pm, edited 8 times in total.
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Yeah, exactly like that!
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
...yeah, he did what i wanted. I'v updated and changed the designation to version 1.1
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Version 1.3 has been released.
The innards are the same as they where in version 1.2... but the graph is more useful, and there's a "projectile info" calculator which will give you muzzle energy and velocity in m/s.
The innards are the same as they where in version 1.2... but the graph is more useful, and there's a "projectile info" calculator which will give you muzzle energy and velocity in m/s.
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
EVBEC version 1.4 has been released!
EVBEC v 1.4 (or as I've been mispelling it recently, EVBECH) supports differing exterior and interior pressures...
Essentialy, it allows the estimation of preformance of hybrid spudguns and spudguns being fired from on top of mountains (or with evacuated bores).
EVBEC v 1.4 (or as I've been mispelling it recently, EVBECH) supports differing exterior and interior pressures...
Essentialy, it allows the estimation of preformance of hybrid spudguns and spudguns being fired from on top of mountains (or with evacuated bores).
- MrCrowley
- Moderator

- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
3 posts in a row
...edit your post next time 
never thought I would see that from you.....
Anyway why does it esitmate performance of spudguns on top of mountains? And can this be used with combustions or is it strictly hybrid or is it more GGDT like and if you know your stuff you could get a rough estimation?
never thought I would see that from you.....
Anyway why does it esitmate performance of spudguns on top of mountains? And can this be used with combustions or is it strictly hybrid or is it more GGDT like and if you know your stuff you could get a rough estimation?
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
I've been leaving my old posts alone (and they are indeed very old - some of those 3 you mentioned being posted nearly a year ago) as a kind of running history of EVBEC.
Anyways, EVBEC is design explicatly for the modling of normal combustions and hybrid cannons - no involved trickery is needed to get reasonable results like with the GGDT.
I'm not sure exactly how accurate it is, though, but I'd wager it's within 15% (velocity) a pretty large portion of the time. (yeah, I know... not that impressive. Whatever.)
As to the firing from the top of mountains - that's just an amusing way of saying that it can account for differing atmopheric pressures.
This is more practical than it appears at first glance - it allows the modling of, for instance, evacuated bores. (which, it turns out, can significantly increase muzzle energy)
On the less practical side, it also lets you predict how your hybrid (or normal spudgun) spudgun would preform in space or in a diving bell.
Oh, and I lay claim to the word "lowbrid" to describe a combustion cannon operating at a fractional mix. (like .5x)
(no, I don't claim to know why one would do this... but it's possible and makes cool looking preformance curves...)
Anyways, EVBEC is design explicatly for the modling of normal combustions and hybrid cannons - no involved trickery is needed to get reasonable results like with the GGDT.
I'm not sure exactly how accurate it is, though, but I'd wager it's within 15% (velocity) a pretty large portion of the time. (yeah, I know... not that impressive. Whatever.)
As to the firing from the top of mountains - that's just an amusing way of saying that it can account for differing atmopheric pressures.
This is more practical than it appears at first glance - it allows the modling of, for instance, evacuated bores. (which, it turns out, can significantly increase muzzle energy)
On the less practical side, it also lets you predict how your hybrid (or normal spudgun) spudgun would preform in space or in a diving bell.
Oh, and I lay claim to the word "lowbrid" to describe a combustion cannon operating at a fractional mix. (like .5x)
(no, I don't claim to know why one would do this... but it's possible and makes cool looking preformance curves...)
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Well, I've released EVBEC 1.5.
It now accounts for... gas flows!
The modling techniques are somewhat speculative, but I think they should be fairly close, assuming I didnt't make any typos or something...
It now accounts for... gas flows!
The modling techniques are somewhat speculative, but I think they should be fairly close, assuming I didnt't make any typos or something...
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
...this post is temporary hosting for my EVBEC live page.
- Attachments
-
EL.zip- Yep... EVBEC LIVE
- (1.3 KiB) Downloaded 363 times
Sorry about kicking up an old thread - but I noticed it was linked to from the Wiki.
Can anyone tell me how accurate this is? Should I read much into the results it produces? And if not is there a better combustion calc?
Cheers,
Michael
Can anyone tell me how accurate this is? Should I read much into the results it produces? And if not is there a better combustion calc?
Cheers,
Michael
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 10 Replies
- 3403 Views
-
Last post by boilingleadbath
-
- 19 Replies
- 6782 Views
-
Last post by saefroch
-
- 0 Replies
- 2223 Views
-
Last post by boilingleadbath
-
- 3 Replies
- 15703 Views
-
Last post by soso
-
- 19 Replies
- 4513 Views
-
Last post by SpudFarm





