Top or Bottom

Cannons powered by pneumatic pressure (compressed gas) using a valve or other release.
User avatar
mega_swordman
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 526
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:37 pm
Location: Bay Area, California
Contact:

atreverse12 and I (I know him personally) are having a dispute about a pneumatic rifle and I was hoping (much smarter about this that us) could help resolve it.

The question is as follows: Is it better the have an in-line sprinkler valve on the bottom of the cannon, near the chamber, or is it better on top near the barrel?
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." George S. Patton
User avatar
deusXmachina
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:06 pm

I personally prefer it on top....wait wrong discussion XD

The less restriction you have between the valve and the barrel, the better. So in your case I guess it would be having the inline on top, inline with the barrel. The logic being if you have the U-bend before the valve, it is just air under pressure that isn't moving that fast, but if you have the U-bend after the valve, you have high-flow air moving through a restriction. How much of a difference that makes, I dunno.
"On a scale from 1-10, I hope you fall in front of a bus."

:white stuff pours out of piston: "What is that? It looks like milk."
"....<i>Well...</i> it's not milk."

YAAAAAAAAYYYY WE'RE DOOMED!
User avatar
Blitz
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
United States of America
Posts: 627
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:48 am
Location: Illinois
Been thanked: 3 times

I concur with deus.

The more direct path air has beyond the valve to the projectile and the atmosphere, the more efficient.
User avatar
jssizzle
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:27 am

Like deus said, it is definitely better to have the valve closest to the barrel, in this case before the "U". If it was closer to the chamber, it wold create what we call dead space, making the air travel a greater distance before hitting the projectile in the barrel.
User avatar
mega_swordman
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 526
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:37 pm
Location: Bay Area, California
Contact:

Hmm yes. That means I win. Thank you very much, now if you excuse me, I'm going to show atreverse12 that he is wrong.
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." George S. Patton
rad14701
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:59 pm

The dead space issue is definitely the determining factor... The closer the chamber pressure is to the barrel, the better... Pressurizing dead space slows the firing process and reduces the overall velocity generated within the barrel...
User avatar
spudthug
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 936
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: johnsonburg, Pa USA
Contact:

although this is true that a valve traveling that far is dead space but also if u have the valve at the top it has to go throguh the bends....say u have 1 inch bends on a 4 inch chamber it has to be restricted greatly..most people prefer the sprinkler valves at the bottom of the gun..
4" piston valved cannon-half done..( i spilt my cement...)

Hybrid- 75% done. need to build propane holder and drill/tap sparkplug hole..
User avatar
mega_swordman
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 526
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:37 pm
Location: Bay Area, California
Contact:

However, with the stock(?) of the rifle, and no good way to block the flow from entering the excess pipe, I feel it is better to have pressure on the joints than to have air flowing through unneeded pipe length.
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." George S. Patton
User avatar
Scope
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Ct
Contact:

Closest to the barrel from what i see... it adds to your chamber volume and does not have airflow restrictions after the valve has opened
paddo
Private 3
Private 3
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 10:20 pm

id say barrel. exact same reason as above. you get more chamber space (good) and the air in the bends is pressurised so the turning will have much less effect.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post