Chamber Barrel ratio (Pneumatic)

Cannons powered by pneumatic pressure (compressed gas) using a valve or other release.
User avatar
TwitchTheAussie
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 980
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:23 am

Lets all do ourselves a favor here. Follow my way. 1:1xvalve speed. Voilah problem solved.
Raise your horns if you love metal.
spudgunning is like sex, once you've tasted, you can't wait til next time.
-
CpTn_lAw
User avatar
jimmy101
Sergeant Major 2
Sergeant Major 2
United States of America
Posts: 3210
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

Like JackS said, no real need to do extensive gun building to figure it out. GGDT will get the trend exactly right.

And, you need to decide what you are going for, maximum muzzle velocity or maximum efficiency.

The 0.2:1 CB gives about the maximum efficiency of a pneumatic gun.
CB's above 1:1 will give much higher muzzle velocities.

Compressed gas and chamber pipe is cheap so people usually go for performance and build guns with chambers larger than the barrel.
Image
User avatar
DYI
First Sergeant 5
First Sergeant 5
Antigua & Barbuda
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Here and there

The 0.2:1 ratio is the most powerful as well as the most efficient, which makes loads of sense when you think about it. If you have a gun with a 0.2:1 ratio, and you cut off 4/5 of the barrel, performance will decrease dramatically. And if you're increasing chamber volume, an increased C:B will ALWAYS yield more energy, so there is no argument
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
User avatar
daberno123
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 594
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Ohio

I am doing the C:B ratio of pneumatics for my science fair project. I'm going to start off with a 10' barrel and then cut a piece off each shot and I'll see how the fps differs. I'll post the results once I have finished testing. (sometime in march)
User avatar
DYI
First Sergeant 5
First Sergeant 5
Antigua & Barbuda
Posts: 2862
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Here and there

I hope you do realise that you can do this entire project without ever building a cannon? All you have to do is model it on GGDT, for very accurate results. Doing hybrid C:B ratios would provide much needed information for the community, whereas doing pneumatic C:B ratios will provide us with information that we can already obtain simply by modeling the performance on GGDT.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
User avatar
JDP12
Staff Sergeant 5
Staff Sergeant 5
Posts: 1943
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:34 pm

yea go with GGDT, easy, simple, and saves a lot of time and trouble.

also, i forget who said it, but pneumatics are entirely dependent on valve design. I could have a perfect (if there is such a thing) C:B ratio on my pneumatic, but have a .5" PVC ball valve, which are nightmares to turn and restrict flow terribly, so that gun would suck.

or i could have a gun with a crappy C:B ratio, but an extremely good valve, (burst disk for example-fastest opening), and it would perform better than the gun with the good C:B ratio, but a crappy valve.

Decide what valve you want first essentially
"Some say his pet elephant is pink, and that he has no understanding of "PG rated forum". All we know is, he's called JSR. "
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post