Page 2 of 6
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:34 pm
by Maniac
yea ill try too but i tried to get on once when there were 60 people on and it wouldnt let me. maybe most of them were guests or sumthin.
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:36 pm
by clide
That 399 peak would be from the day my Slider gun hit the front page of Digg. Yes, it crashed the server.
http://www.digg.com/mods/Build_your_own ... epot_parts
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:51 pm
by potatoflinger
_Fnord wrote:
Also, everyone has to send a random PM to jack that day
Yeah, we need to do that regardless of whether or not we try to break 399.
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:29 pm
by Carlman
are you being serious you crashed digg's server, thats ridiculous lol
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:51 pm
by benstern
Ah I remember the digg fiasco...good times...
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 9:49 pm
by rna_duelers
I'll be to drunk and possibly on fire by then...So I won't be able to join in.
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:08 pm
by FordGtMan
Wow thats so weird... I was just about to start a topic on the same thing
I will be on!!!!!
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:00 pm
by clide
Carlman wrote:
are you being serious you crashed digg's server, thats ridiculous lol
Other way around, Digg crashed this server...like it does to most servers.
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:26 pm
by MrCrowley
In that case i'm waiting for the day when Benstern's Non-Stick Balls remedy crashes the theopian server
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 12:33 am
by Eddbot
dude!!! i was thinkin the same exact thing!!! i was about to post a topic on it but then i saw this... whatever... i'll be on
PS. Crowley, i just got the connection between your name and your avatar, kinda slow i know but i never noticed till now
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 12:44 am
by FordGtMan
Eddbot and i must share some mind thoughts cause thats just like what i said...
or was that sarcasm?
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:37 pm
by Eddbot
no, not sarcasm, but i see how it could be conveyed as such, my bad and i tried to get on today and the server wouldn't let me because there were too many people on, i think it was 53, anyway just FYI
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:01 pm
by bigbob12345
Sounds like a good idea Ill log on
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:02 pm
by sandman
same here ther was 53 on and it would not let me on
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:37 pm
by Fnord
That wasn't the number of people online...
It was a number specifying the line # the error occurred on.