Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:30 pm
by Counterstriker
Ohh Yah I know I need a longer barrel. I have another longer barrel but it didn't fit the ammo in it. It wasn't met to be too impressive

Sice I am still working the kinks outa the gay union.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:37 pm
by SpudBlaster15
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:25 am
by DYI
So DYI, what ever happened to your original plan to build the SCTBDC as a handheld cannon?
Personally, I blame clide, for alerting me that I could use a longer barrel on the 1.0 version. Before that, I had always heard that 2:1 was the best C:B ratio for pneumatics, and had never really thought much about it. Then I started testing on GGDT, and realised that I could still be gaining performance at a 12' long barrel... and the handheld design went downhill from there.
The funny thing is, now I'm trying to downscale and increase portability and ease of use. However, since I'm so impressed with what my big guns can do, I want the same power, but in a handheld package. This gets rather difficult.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:48 am
by SpudFarm
haha, i think you can do it if you make your hybrid handheld...
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:05 pm
by DYI
Don't worry spudfarm, the handheld launcher is on its way.
The near-complete hybrid project at the moment will only be capable of 10x, nowhere near high enough to make a handheld size worth it in my opinion.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:06 pm
by OuchProgramme
Hmmm...the shot wasn't too impressive =/.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:14 pm
by bigbob12345
That wasnt amazing but it is what you would expect from 10psi.
100psi should yield much better results .
I think the barrel diameter is overkill for the chamber size but I guess it doesnt matter that much but atleast maker the brreo longer as DYI mentioned.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:27 pm
by Counterstriker
bigbob12345 wrote:That wasnt amazing but it is what you would expect from 10psi.
100psi should yield much better results .
I think the barrel diameter is overkill for the chamber size but I guess it doesnt matter that much but atleast maker the brreo longer as DYI mentioned.
..Read...
Counterstriker wrote:Ohh Yah I know I need a longer barrel. I have another longer barrel but it didn't fit the ammo in it. It wasn't met to be too impressive

Sice I am still working the kinks outa the gay union.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:32 pm
by OuchProgramme
Why dont you add a reducing coupler to a smaller barrel-In diameter- for better results?
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:34 pm
by bigbob12345
Counterstriker wrote:bigbob12345 wrote:That wasnt amazing but it is what you would expect from 10psi.
100psi should yield much better results .
I think the barrel diameter is overkill for the chamber size but I guess it doesnt matter that much but atleast maker the brreo longer as DYI mentioned.
..Read...
Counterstriker wrote:Ohh Yah I know I need a longer barrel. I have another longer barrel but it didn't fit the ammo in it. It wasn't met to be too impressive

Sice I am still working the kinks outa the gay union.
Sorry, Ive really been really stupid lately.
Maybe I need to take a break from this forum to recover
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:28 pm
by SpudBlaster15
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras nec placerat erat. Vivamus dapibus egestas nunc, at eleifend neque. Suspendisse potenti. Sed dictum lacus eu nisl pretium vehicula. Ut faucibus hendrerit nisi. Integer ultricies orci eu ultrices malesuada. Fusce id mauris risus. Suspendisse finibus ligula et nisl rutrum efficitur. Vestibulum posuere erat pellentesque ornare venenatis. Integer commodo fermentum tortor in pharetra. Proin scelerisque consectetur posuere. Vestibulum molestie augue ac nibh feugiat scelerisque. Sed aliquet a nunc in mattis.