Page 3 of 3

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:55 pm
by goathunter
Kenny,lots of chinese SKS's have stamped receivers.Cuts down on cost(typical chinese junk).I have a 5 SKS's I know my guns.
Definition of “tactical” according to Judgment Arms:
A.)To be tactical the arm must be easy to use, easy to carry, and have very little to go wrong with it and when a problem does occur it must be easy to fix.
Judgement,We have the same definition of Tactical.I've built 3 paintball cannons so far.You'll see my newest creation in this next competition :twisted: I was just contemplating building a more historically accurate arm to use.I have been considering a coaxial but still am not sure yet.Yeah, if you want to make a write up go ahead might help the new guys to scenario play.I've been playing scenario for 4yrs and running a cannon for 2. Any info is helpful. I might do a write up as well.We should see if they can be thrown i the WIKI section as a resource.

Here's the link to the chinese sks reciever http://www.simonov.net/ubertypes.htm

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:03 pm
by judgment_arms
I already did my how-to, here’s a link: paintball “tactical” anti-tank weapon

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:37 pm
by AmYisroelChai
If you find this post on a serch. And you are interested in this. See the authors other mre in depth post here:

http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/viewtop ... bbe4#75622

Sorry to kick it up but the forward will be helpful to future newcomers.

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:41 pm
by judgment_arms
Ain’t got a problem with the forward, but what does “mre” mean? I’m guessing it’s a typo, and I doubt that you’re talking about Meals Ready to Eat.

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:33 am
by Arborman
I will not put a blast child on the panzerschreck. For now :)

I will be a coaxial piston valve. I want to make it look "like" a panzershreck, but a few things will look different.

And as for the sks, I dont know about the one in the picture, but mine is a Russian 1951 model. I got a bunch o banana clips for it and the original underfolding blade bayonet. It is in VERY nice condition.

And Oh YEAH... It's ALL milled

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:05 pm
by goathunter
Russian nice,I have yugo's.The chinese where the only ones who messed up such a beautiful firearm(stamping the reciever).I'd like to see that panzerschreck when you are done that sounds cool.

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:19 pm
by judgment_arms
As would I, but a Panzerschreck with out the shield is just a Bazooka.
But I can under stand you wishing to leave that off, that’s a lot of fabricating to make it look right.
Yeah, the only thing the Chinese can do right is airguns:

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:58 pm
by Arborman
I will make the Panzerschreck. The trigger and a couple of other things will look different. Just like how your LAW, however close, does not look EXACTLY like a LAW or a bazooka. After i make it, like the rest of my guns, I will slowly improve it untill I think it is perfect. These improvements will mainly be cosmetic, like the sheild or a trigger that better resembles the original.

So don't get your hopes up yet. I promise that it will be super cool, but it won't exactly resemble a panzerschreck, despite my best efforts.

Its size will be close to the real thing. Four inch tube x Five feet. But the barrel will only be 2". :(

You will see a shield on that thing before the end of the year.

Anyone have any ideas on mounting the thing on the tube?

Pic of the REAL PANZERSCHRECK...
http://www.war-toys.com/figures/panzers ... chreck.jpg

I also want to have some sort of mount for a barrel extender, but I do not know how to do this without messing up "the look" of the gun