Well my gun is 90 percent done, with everything sealing and the chamber filling up properly, but there's one problem and thats that the piston isn't getting pushed back at all when i fire it- so all the air is going around the piston and out the pilot. me and my dad worked on it for a bit and calculated some things out and realized that there was BARELY ANY surface area on the piston for it to get pushed back by.
so we were going to reduce the size of the barrel in the tee down to 2" instead of 3" to give it more surface area, I just want some quick opinions on if you think it will work or not
surface area for air to push against?
When you say barely any, what percentage are we talking about, and what's your piloting mechanism?
Pistons can actually work better with a restricted surface area - and indeed, HEAL uses the trick, with only about 15% of the piston area to push on, which actually improves opening time.
Although, it's worth noting that the lower area pistons are best complimented by high pressures.
Pistons can actually work better with a restricted surface area - and indeed, HEAL uses the trick, with only about 15% of the piston area to push on, which actually improves opening time.
Although, it's worth noting that the lower area pistons are best complimented by high pressures.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
um... we're talking about a ring of the piston about MAYBE 3/16" wide, so its nothing at all, and only about 80 PSI right now if that much.
it's piloted by a QEV which is piloted by a 3/4" ball valve
it's piloted by a QEV which is piloted by a 3/4" ball valve
Last edited by JDP12 on Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Sticky_Tape
- Sergeant 2

- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada.
What size is the qev you are useing? I suggest to get a tighter piston and lube.
You can tell how awesome a cannon is by the pressure used.
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/high-pr ... 12803.html
xnt rnm ne z ahtbg
http://www.spudfiles.com/forums/high-pr ... 12803.html
xnt rnm ne z ahtbg
It's not a lot of use just that information - I need to know the overall diameter of the piston to compare it to.ilovetoblowthingsup wrote:um... we're talking about a ring of the piston about MAYBE 3/16" wide
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
Yeah, that will be a problem, that's only about 8% of the piston area.
How big is the equalisation hole(s) between the pilot volume and chamber? If you can cut them back, or ideally install some o-rings and check valves, then it might be possible to get it to pilot - if it worked, the valve's power would be very decent.
Really, that's the trade off. A bigger seat area gives more valve flow, and indirectly, better opening time, but it becomes increasingly hard to get it to pilot.
How big is the equalisation hole(s) between the pilot volume and chamber? If you can cut them back, or ideally install some o-rings and check valves, then it might be possible to get it to pilot - if it worked, the valve's power would be very decent.
Really, that's the trade off. A bigger seat area gives more valve flow, and indirectly, better opening time, but it becomes increasingly hard to get it to pilot.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
well right now, my piston is really a piece of crap i'm going to have to make a new one. i'm hoping to make it out of a flat 3" end cap that is turned down a lathe so it slides smoothly, and rely on the small gap between the pipe and piston to fill it.
the equalization hole is big- and there is a lot of gaps around the piston.
so i think my plan is to make a new piston that fits good, and reduce the barrel size inside the tee itself, so there is a smaller seat area and larger area for the air to push back against.
the equalization hole is big- and there is a lot of gaps around the piston.
so i think my plan is to make a new piston that fits good, and reduce the barrel size inside the tee itself, so there is a smaller seat area and larger area for the air to push back against.
How do you get 3/16th inch difference in diameter when the piston is 4 and the seat area is 3 inch? 13/16th inch of pipe wall?!
It should be possible to pilot this with a good o-ring seal and a BIG pilot valve.
Instead of making your seat diameter 2", I'd recommend 2,5".
EDIT:
Ah it has to be based on the fact that the pressure starts working on surface area inside the seat diameter just after the valve starts opening and thus the valve slams open because the pilot is almost empty before it started moving.
I think Im going to make some graphs and do some mathematical approaches to check this out.
It should be possible to pilot this with a good o-ring seal and a BIG pilot valve.
Instead of making your seat diameter 2", I'd recommend 2,5".
Interesting. Any more information or a link to some topic to enlighten this?Pistons can actually work better with a restricted surface area - and indeed, HEAL uses the trick, with only about 15% of the piston area to push on, which actually improves opening time.
EDIT:
Ah it has to be based on the fact that the pressure starts working on surface area inside the seat diameter just after the valve starts opening and thus the valve slams open because the pilot is almost empty before it started moving.
I think Im going to make some graphs and do some mathematical approaches to check this out.
The amount of piston area exposed IS the piston diameter surface minus seat diameter surface.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 2153 Views
-
Last post by Biopyro
-
- 6 Replies
- 2074 Views
-
Last post by jimmy101
-
- 13 Replies
- 6280 Views
-
Last post by iknowmy3tables
-
- 6 Replies
- 1640 Views
-
Last post by SpudFarm
-
- 4 Replies
- 1947 Views
-
Last post by Gippeto



